Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

IN RE CHACONAS' ESTATE

November 8, 1948

In re CHACONAS' ESTATE


The opinion of the court was delivered by: TAMM

Nicholas T. Chaconas, a resident of the District of Coumbia, died on December 5, 1946. His last will and testament, being dated the 3rd day of April 1926, was admitted to probate in this District on January 30, 1947. During the course of the administration of the estate, the daughter of the testator, Katherine M. Lowstuter, filed a caveat challenging the will, which caveat was dismissed by this Court prior to the trial of the current action. The will of Nicholas T. Chaconas which, as indicated above, was dated April 3, 1926, directed first that 'all my just debts and funeral expenses be paid as soon after my demise as shall be found convenient'. The next proviso of the Will states: 'My will is that the sum of . . . thousand eight hundredd dollars ( . . . ,800) cash be given my beloved brother Gus T. Chaconas of Sporta, Greece.'

Thereafter a residuary clause leaves the balance of the testator's estate to his 'beloved wife, Lucy H. Chaconas'. The provision of the will relating to Gus T. Chaconas is the subject of the current litigation. Blank spaces have been left at two points above to indicate that dispute exists as to the word and numeral operative in the will to designate the amount bequeathed to Gus T. Chaconas, in the event a valid bequest was made. From testimony of an expert document-examiner witness, during the course of the trial, the evidence established that the word 'six' was initially written immediately preceding the words 'thousand Eight Hundred Dollars'; that subsequently this word was written over by the word 'five', and that subsequently thereto the word 'tow', meaning 'two' was written in this space. Similarly the testimony indicated that although the figure '2' was written very heavily preceding the figures '800' in this clause of the will, prior to the writing of the numeral '2', the numeral '5' had appeared at this point. The testimony further indicated that another numeral could have been written in this space prior to the writing of the numeral '5' and the subsequent imposition of the numeral '2'. Since the numeral '2' was written by the retracing of the numeral in a heavy ink, a number of times, the figure, if any, antedating the numeral '5' has been completely obliterated from visibility either to the naked eye or by miscroscopic examination.

 The petitioner in the present proceedings claims that the two minors are the children of Gus T. Chaconas and, as such, claims from the Administratrix of the estate of Nicholas T. Chaconas the amount of the bequest to their deceased father. Theodore Gus Chaconas and Katherine Chaconas, both born in Greece, came to the United States early in 1947 and in due course, through their guardian, initiated this action for the purpose of obtaining from the Administratrix of the estate of Nicholas T. Chaconas, the bequest made to Gus T. Chaconas. The Administratrix, Lucy Chaconas, widow of the testator, challenges the identity of Theodore Gus Chaconas and Katherine Chaconas as the issue of Gus T. Chaconas and, as set forth hereinafter in the statement of the issues, challenges the amount, if any, of the bequest to Gus T. Chaconas. It is the contention of the Administratrix that the paragraph of Nicholas T. Chaconas' will relating to Gus T. Chaconas, represented an intention and effort on the part of the testator to transmit to his brother, Gus T. Chaconas, the balance owing by Nicholas T. Chaconas to Gus T. Chaconas, the proceeds of the sales of property which were the subject of trust agreement which, as noted above, antedated the will by some years.

 The hearing of this case was upon an agreed Order Framing Issues to determine, without a jury, the findings of the Court upon the following questions:

 'One: Are Theodore Gus Chaconas and Katherine Chaconas, minors, for whom John George Scounas in guardian, in Guardianship No. 10844 in the District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia, the issue of the same Gus T. Chaconas, deceased, who was the brother of Nicholas T. Chaconas, testator?

 'Two: Was there a valid bequest in the purported Last Will and Testament of Nicholas T. Chaconas to his brother, Gus T. Chaconas?

 'Three: If so, what was the amount of that bequest?

 'Four: Did decedent obliterate the second paragraph of the Will to such an extent as to render that clause of the Will void?

 'Five: If it is determined that the second paragraph of the Will did validly make a bequest and if it be further determined that decedent did not obliterate that provision to such an extent as to render it void, did decedent at some time subsequent to the execution of said Will make payments of sums of money with the intention that such payment or payments be deemed in partial satisfaction of the bequest, and if so, what is the total amount of such payments?'

 The Court makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law with reference to the specific questions raised by the Order framing issues:

 'Q. One: Are Theodore Gus Chaconas and Katherine Chaconas, minors, for whom John George Scounas is guardian, in Guardianship No. 10844 in the District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia (now the United States District Court for the District of Columbia), the issue of the same Gus T. Chaconas, deceased, who was the brother of Nicholas T. Chaconas, testator?

 'A. The Court finds that Theodore Gus Chaconas and Katherine Chaconas, minors, are the issue of the same Gus T. Chaconas, deceased, who was the brother of Nicholas T. Chaconas, testator. A preponderance of the evidence supports this conclusion.

 'Q. Two: Was there a valid bequest in the purported Last Will and Testament of Nicholas T. Chaconas to his brother, Gus T. Chaconas? A. There was a valid bequest in the Last Will and Testament of ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.