Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

STONE v. ROSENBAUM

June 2, 1989

ANDREW L. STONE, Individually and as Successor-in-Interest to Chromcraft Corp. and Alsco, Inc., Plaintiff,
v.
FRANCIS N. ROSENBAUM, Defendant



The opinion of the court was delivered by: GESELL

GERHARD A. GESELL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default Judgment Against Defendant is denied.

 The Court determined at the scheduling conference to proceed to resolution by cross-motions. Denial of defendant's original motion to dismiss was without prejudice to permit further consideration of additional issues suggested by the Court under the schedule set. No answer was required or necessary. The issues were delineated and ripe for disposition. Plaintiff's broad plea for equitable relief required prompt consideration because of its bearing on issues pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

 Defendant's Motion for Clarification of Court Order dated March 22, 1989, or in the alternative, for Leave to File an Answer Out of Time is moot.

 SO ORDERED.

19890602

© 1992-2004 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.