Not what you're
looking for? Try an advanced search.
04/13/92 CHARLES E. GRAY v. CITIZENS BANK
April 13, 1992
CHARLES E. GRAY, APPELLANT
v.
CITIZENS BANK OF WASHINGTON, FORMERLY MCLACHLEN NATIONAL, APPELLEE
Original Opinion of February 4, 1992,
Before: Rogers, Chief Judge; Ferren, Terry, Steadman, Schwelb, Farrell, Wagner, King, and Sullivan, Associate Judges.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Per Curiam
On consideration of appellant's petition for rehearing en banc, the opposition and the reply thereto, and the motion of Metropolitan Washington Employment Lawyers Association for leave to file brief as amicus curiae in support of the petitioner, the lodged brief, the opposition and the reply thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion for leave to file brief is granted and the Clerk is directed to file the lodged brief of amicus curiae; and it appearing that the majority of the Judges of this court has voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc, it is
FURTHER ORDERED that appellant's petition for rehearing en banc is granted and that the opinion and judgment of February 4, 1992, are hereby vacated. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall schedule this matter for argument before the court sitting en banc on Thursday, May 7, 1992, at 9:30 a.m. Counsel are hereby directed to provide ten copies of the briefs theretofore filed to the Clerk on or before April 24, 1992.