Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

IN RE REYNOLDS

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.


April 9, 1998

IN RE ARTHUR M. REYNOLDS, JR., RESPONDENT. A MEMBER OF THE BAR OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS.

Before Farrell and Reid, Associate Judges, and Kern, Senior Judge.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Per Curiam:

In these consolidated matters, the Board on Professional Responsibility recommends reciprocal discipline consisting of indefinite suspension of respondent in accordance with an identical suspension by consent which was imposed by the Court of Appeals of Maryland. The Board recommends further that respondent be required to satisfy the provisions of D.C. Bar R. XI, § 13(g) (1997) ("Reinstatement of incapacitated attorney") before being reinstated. Finally, the Board recommends that three additional reciprocal disciplinary matters pending against respondent be held in abeyance until such time as he applies for reinstatement. Respondent does not oppose any of these recommendations.

Bar Counsel originally excepted to the Board's recommendation and asked that the matter be returned to the Board for further explanation of why it recommended reciprocal discipline based upon the Maryland consent suspension rather than upon the other pending reciprocal matters, each involving disbarment or lengthy suspension of respondent for serious misconduct. At oral argument, however, Bar Counsel withdrew the request for a remand upon the understanding of all parties that before the Board can recommend respondent's reinstatement it must address the other reciprocal matters.

Accordingly, we accept the Board's recommendations. Pursuant to D.C. Bar R. XI, § 11, respondent is suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia retroactive to May 2, 1997, the date on which he complied with the affidavit requirements of D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g). *fn1 See In re Cornish, 691 A.2d 156 (D.C. 1997) (per curiam). Before respondent is reinstated, two conditions must be met: respondent must meet the requirements of Rule XI, § 13(g), and this court, upon recommendations of the Board, must have disposed of the remaining petitions against respondent for reciprocal discipline. *fn1

So ordered. [707 A2d Page 1297]


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.