Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

McLaurin v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA


September 22, 1999

LEON MCLAURIN, ET AL. PLAINTIFFS,
v.
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: The Honorable Emmet G. Sullivan United States District Court Judge

CONSENT DECREE

I. INTRODUCTION

This Consent Decree sets forth the full and final terms by which Named Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and members of the Class defined herein, and Defendant National Railroad Passenger Corporation ("Amtrak"), have settled and resolved all claims or potential claims between them relating to Management positions, including all claims of any alleged race discrimination against African American Management employees and African American applicants for Management positions, as those terms will be defined herein, through or as a result of any alleged discriminatory purpose, pattern or practice, or adverse impact of Amtrak's practices and policies with respect to hiring, compensation, training, performance appraisals, promotions, transfers, discipline, termination, the toleration of a hostile working environment, and other personnel practices or decisions. This Decree does not encompass claims relating to or arising from employment in non-Management positions, other than non-Management employee claims relating to application for promotion to Management positions, and Management employee claims relating to demotion to non-Management positions. Amtrak has voluntarily entered into this Consent Decree to address concerns raised by its diverse workforce, to avoid protracted and costly litigation, and to focus its corporate resources on serving Amtrak's customers and operating a first-class national rail passenger system.

II. NATURE OF THE CASE

On August 20, 1998, twelve Black Amtrak employees who are or have been employed in Management positions at Amtrak, or were rejected for employment in Management positions at times when they were not employed by Amtrak, or were rejected for employment in Management positions at times when they were employed by Amtrak in non-Management positions, and one Caucasian Management employee who allegedly was retaliated against for opposing discrimination against African Americans, filed a Complaint in this Court. The Plaintiffs asserted claims against Amtrak for race discrimination in hiring, job assignments, promotions, performance appraisals, discipline, compensation, and training. The Complaint further alleged a pattern and practice of discrimination by Amtrak and tolerance of a racially hostile working environment. The Plaintiffs asserted claims on behalf of themselves and putatively on behalf of similarly situated current and former employees and rejected Internal and External Applicants for Management positions. On November 20, 1998, the Plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint, which added sixteen additional Plaintiffs and putative Class representatives. The Plaintiffs' claims were brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. ("Title VII") and 42 U.S.C. § 1981. Amtrak filed an answer to the Complaint denying the allegations and specifically denying any violation of law.

The Parties voluntarily entered into mediation in November 1998 in an effort to address, outside of the courtroom, the concerns raised by Plaintiffs and to avoid litigation costs. While formal discovery has not been completed, the Parties have taken sufficient discovery, and have voluntarily exchanged sufficient information, to assess the relative merits of the systemic claims of the Plaintiffs and the putative Class, and of Amtrak's defenses. After several months of mediation and negotiation, the Parties reached an agreement-in-principle on July 1, 1999, the terms of which are incorporated in and superseded by this Consent Decree.

III. GENERAL TERMS OF THE DECREE

A. Definitions

For purposes of this Consent Decree (interchangeably the "Decree") and all exhibits hereto, the capitalized terms in such documents shall have the meanings set forth below. All terms defined in the singular shall have the same meaning when used in the plural, and all terms defined in the plural shall have the same meaning when used in the singular.

1. "Amtrak" is a corporation incorporated under the laws of the District of Columbia engaged in the transportation of passengers by railroad and related businesses as defined by 45 U.S.C. §501 et seq. Any references to "Amtrak" shall include the National Railroad Passenger Corporation, its past and present directors, officers, agents, employees, and other representatives.

2. "Named Plaintiffs," "Class Representatives," or "Plaintiffs" mean those twenty-nine individuals who were named as Plaintiffs in the First Amended Complaint. The names of all of the Named Plaintiffs in this litigation are set forth in Exhibit A.

3. "Parties" means the Named Plaintiffs and Amtrak.

4. "Black" shall be defined as in Appendix 4 of the current Instruction Booklet for completion of Standard Form 100, Employer Information Report EEO-1. The terms "Black" and "African American" are used interchangeably, and for purposes of this Decree, shall include Black aliens, lawfully able to work for Amtrak but who are not of American citizenry or descent.

5. The phrases "applied to" Amtrak or "applied for," or "applicant for" employment at Amtrak means expressed interest, or a person who expressed interest, in employment at Amtrak through participation in a job fair, submission of an application form or resume, participation in an interview, or any other contact with Amtrak concerning possible or potential employment. "Internal Applicants" means applicants who were not selected for employment in Management positions at times when they were employed by Amtrak in non-Management positions. "External Applicants" means applicants who were not selected for employment by Amtrak in Management positions at times when they were not employed by Amtrak.

6. "Lead Counsel" for purposes of this Decree means Michael Lieder, Maia Caplan, and other attorneys of the law firm of Sprenger & Lang, 1614 Twentieth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20009. "Class Counsel" refers to the above Lead Counsel as well as Roderic V.O. Boggs, Avis Buchanan, Susan Huhta, and other attorneys of the Washington Lawyers' Committee on Civil Rights & Urban Affairs, 11 Dupont Circle, N.W., Suite 400, Washington, D.C. 20036; Ozell Hudson, Jr., Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law of the Boston Bar Association, 294 Washington Street, Suite 940, Boston, MA 02108; and Andrew A. Rainer, Shapiro, Haber & Urmy LLP, 75 State Street, Boston, MA 02109.

7. "Management employees" or "Management positions" means employees or positions not subject to a collective bargaining agreement ("CBA"), and not on the Amtrak Management Committee. Conversely, "non-Management positions" or "non-Management employees" means positions or employees covered by a CBA.

8. "Amtrak's Counsel" means the law firm of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, 1800 M Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036, including attorneys Thomas E. Reinert, Jr. and Grace E. Speights.

9. "Class Members" or "Class," or any variation of such term means all members of the Class defined in Part III(D) of this Decree.

10. "District Court" or "Court" means the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.

11. "Payee" means attorneys (including former attorneys) for any of the Plaintiffs or Class Members, and all experts, consultants and others associated with or retained by Plaintiffs or such attorneys, including Class Counsel. Payments to Payees shall be subject to, and limited by, Section V of the Decree.

12. The "Non-Injunctive Effective Date" for the provisions of this Decree relating to Job Relief or the Fund shall refer to the date on which the Court has finally approved, signed, and entered this Decree and the time for appeal has run without an appeal being filed or, if an appeal is filed, the final resolution of that appeal (including any requests for rehearing en banc, petitions for certiorari, or appellate review). The "Injunctive Effective Date" for the remaining provisions of this Decree relating to injunctive relief shall refer to January 1, 2000, or the date by which the Court has finally approved, signed, and entered this Decree and the time for appeal has run without an appeal being filed or, if an appeal is filed, the final resolution of that appeal (including any requests for rehearing, rehearing en banc, petitions for certiorari, or appellate review), whichever is later.

13. "Settlement Fund" or "Fund" means the qualified settlement fund created by the deposit, in the installments and at the times agreed to by the Parties, of $8 million in principal by Amtrak, the purpose and administration of which are governed by Part V of this Decree.

14. "EEO Office" or "EEO Resolution Unit" means Amtrak's internal Equal Employment Opportunity unit in the Department of Business Diversity and Strategic Initiatives ("Business Diversity"), while the term "EEO" shall refer to equal employment opportunity, as that phrase is understood legally.

15. "Claim Resolution Process" or "CP" means the procedures for resolution of Eligible Claims as set forth in Part V of the Consent Decree.

16. "Claimant" means any person who is eligible to make, and who has made, a claim in the Claim Resolution Process as set forth in Part V(B) of the Consent Decree.

17. "Class Claim" means any individual or class-wide race discrimination claim, administrative charge, demand, complaint, right, and cause of action of any kind, known or unknown, by a Class Representative or Class Member against Amtrak for monetary or equitable relief or for attorney's fees, arising from any events, acts, omissions, policies, practices, procedures, conditions, or occurrences concerning employment in Management positions with Amtrak or applications for Management positions with Amtrak at any time on or after January 1, 1995, but no later than September 30, 1999, under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000 et seq., the Civil Rights Act of 1866, 42 U.S.C. § 1981 et seq., or any other federal, state, District of Columbia or local statute, regulation, rule, order, ordinance or other authority of any nature prohibiting racial discrimination in employment. Class Claim refers to any claims or other cause of action described above brought in an arbitral, judicial or other forum of whatsoever kind or nature.

18. "Mandatory Joinder Claim" means any claim arising out of the same occurrence, event, or nucleus of facts as any Class Claim.

19. "Eligible Claims" means all Class Claims and Mandatory Joinder Claims.

20. "Job Relief Process" means the procedures under Part VII of this Decree for resolution of Job Relief Claims.

21. "Eligible Job Claims" means all claims that meet the eligibility requirements for processing under Part VII of the Decree.

22. "Job Relief Election Form" means the form used to designate an affirmative election to participate in the Job Relief Process mailed by the Job Claimant to Class Counsel.

23. "Job Claimant" means any person who is eligible and selects to make, and has made, a claim in the Job Relief Process under Part VII of the Decree.

24. "Administrator" or "Trustee" means the persons designated by Plaintiffs and Amtrak to effectuate the Settlement terms, concerning the satisfaction and resolution of all Claimants' claims pursuant to the Claim Resolution Process set forth in Part V(B) of this Decree; receiving and processing information from Claimants pertaining to their claims; investing, allocating, and distributing the Fund; and in general supervising the administration of the Settlement Fund in accordance with the Decree. The Parties have agreed that Michael Lieder, Esquire and Lawrence Schaefer, Esquire of Sprenger & Lang shall be the Administrators and Trustees of the Settlement Fund.

25. "Claim Form" means the written description of Claimant's Claims served by a Claimant on the Administrator to initiate the Claim Resolution Process.

26. "Claim Form Submission Date" or "Job Relief Election Form Date" means the post-marked date of the respective form that has been mailed to the Administrator or Class Counsel, respectively.

27. "Reduction in Force" or "RIF" means the removal of an employee or group of employees from a position or positions, as the result of the elimination of a position or positions or the reorganization of positions, and shall not include individual employment actions (including terminations, demotions, or transfers) because of discipline or poor performance or other reasons related to the individual employee, in which Amtrak intends to treat the position as vacant and place another individual in substantially the same position.

28. "Statistically Significant" disparity shall mean a disparity measured by at least two standard deviations.

B. Jurisdiction and Venue

The Parties agree that this Court has jurisdiction over the Parties and the subject matter of this action, and that venue is proper. This Court shall retain jurisdiction of this action for the duration of the Decree solely for the purpose of entering all orders, judgments and Decrees authorized hereunder that may be necessary to implement and enforce the relief provided herein.

C. Effective Date and Term of Decree

This Decree and the agreements contained herein are effective as of the Injunctive and Non-Injunctive Effective Dates, as defined in Part III(A), although Amtrak has already implemented or begun to implement many of the items of equitable relief provided. The Decree and the agreements contained in it shall continue to be effective and binding on the Parties and their agents and successors for a four-year period from the Injunctive Effective Date, unless extended or terminated earlier pursuant to the terms of Parts IV.A.1 or IX. The releases and bars on claims shall survive the Decree.

D. Persons Covered By Decree

1. Definition of Class

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(2) and 23(b)(3), the Parties stipulate to the certification of the following Class composed of all Named Plaintiffs and black persons who, at any time between January 1, 1995 and September 30, 1999:

Have been employed by Amtrak in positions, not on the Amtrak Management Committee, and not subject to a collective bargaining agreement ("CBA"), ("Management positions"); and/or have applied and been rejected by Amtrak for Management positions, including Internal Applicants and External Applicants.

2. Opt Out

If this Decree is approved by the Court, all persons within the Class are bound by its terms, except that Class Members, other than Named Plaintiffs, who have elected to opt out of the Class and the settlement described herein following and on Court approval. Class Members who elect to opt out must do so in writing no later than the date specified in the notice provisions contained herein. Elections to opt out must be submitted pursuant to the procedure set forth in the Notice and must be approved by the Court. If more than ten (10) Class Members are permitted to opt out of this Decree, Amtrak may withdraw from this Decree and void this settlement. Amtrak shall have fifteen (15) days from the day that it receives notice that more than 10 Class Members have been permitted to opt out, and of the identity of such individuals, to withdraw from the Decree and to void the settlement.

E. Denial of Liability

Amtrak expressly denies any wrongdoing or liability whatsoever. This Decree represents the compromise of disputed claims. It reflects the Parties' recognition that litigation of these claims would severely burden all concerned and require a massive commitment of time, resources, and money. The Decree does not constitute, and is not intended to constitute, and shall not under any circumstances be deemed to constitute an admission by either Party as to the merits, validity, or accuracy, or lack thereof, of any of the Plaintiffs' allegations or claims in this case. Neither this Court nor any other court has made any findings or expressed any opinion concerning the merits, validity or accuracy of any of the allegations or claims alleged in this action.

Nothing in or related to this Consent Decree, including any action taken to implement it or any statements, discussions, communications, or any materials prepared, exchanged, issued or used during the course of the mediation or negotiations leading up to the Consent Decree may be introduced or used or admitted in any way, in any other judicial, arbitral, administrative, investigative or other proceeding of any kind or nature whatsoever as evidence of discrimination, retaliation, or any violation of Title VII, Section 1981, the common law of any jurisdiction, or any other federal, state or local law, statute, ordinance, regulation, rule or executive order, or any obligation or duty at law or in equity. Documents, data, and information exchanged by the Parties since the inception of the lawsuit may be used in this case solely with respect to enforcement of the Decree, in the event necessary, and/or in the Job Relief Process, as provided in Part XI below.

In the event that Final Approval of this Decree is not obtained, nothing herein shall be deemed to waive any of Amtrak's objections and defenses, including but not limited to objections to Class certification, and neither this Decree nor the Court's preliminary or provisionally final approval hereof shall be admissible in any court regarding the propriety of Class certification or regarding any other issue or subject of this case.

F. Release/Bar of Claims

The provisions of this Decree shall resolve finally and forever hereafter any and all Class Claims and Mandatory Joinder Claims as defined in Part III(A) of this Decree, in law or in equity, of the Named Plaintiffs and Class Members, other than persons who have been allowed by the Court to opt out of this Decree, which any of them, their representatives, agents, heirs, assigns, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, may have, may have had, or in the future may have against Amtrak insofar as any claims arise from or relate to events that occurred prior to September 30, 1999. Named Plaintiffs and Class Members shall further be barred from submitting evidence in any proceeding, other than Claim or Job Relief proceedings under this Consent Decree, concerning any Class Claim or Mandatory Joinder Claim, in support of any claim arising after September 30, 1999.

Res judicata shall apply to all Named Plaintiffs and Class Members (except those who have been allowed by the Court to opt out under the provisions of this Decree) with respect to all Class Claims and Mandatory Joinder Claims, which are known or unknown, actual or potential.

As a condition precedent to the receipt of any relief under the terms of this Decree, Named Plaintiffs and Class Members shall, in consideration thereof, execute Amtrak's Release and the Administrators' Release, exactly as they appear in Exhibits B and D, respectively. The Named Plaintiffs and Class Members shall execute Amtrak's Release and the Administrators' Release before receiving any Job Relief provided under the terms of the Decree or monetary payment from the Settlement Fund, whichever comes first; however, in the event a Named Plaintiff or Class Member does not receive monetary and Job Relief simultaneously, the execution of Amtrak's Release and the Administrators' Release at the time the first form of relief is awarded shall not extinguish his or her claim for the other form of relief if he or she is also entitled to such other form of relief under the terms of this Decree.

The Complaint in this action against Amtrak shall be dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice, on the Non-Injunctive Effective Date, pursuant to the Joint Stipulation of Dismissal, attached hereto as Exhibit C. Within three weeks following the Non-Injunctive Effective Date, Class Counsel shall make good faith efforts to secure the prompt withdrawal or dismissal of any other pending lawsuits, appeals, administrative charges or other proceedings with respect to any Class Claims brought against Amtrak by the Named Plaintiffs, any of their other clients, and any Class Members (except those who have been allowed to opt out), that have been identified to Class Counsel by Amtrak.

G. Conflicts/Confidential Information

Due to Class Counsel's continuing representation of the Class, their receipt of confidential information regarding Amtrak during this litigation, and their continuing receipt of such confidential information during the term of the Decree, Class Counsel agree during the term of the Consent Decree not to undertake any representation that would create a conflict of interest or involve the use of Amtrak's confidential information for purposes unrelated to the enforcement of the Decree.

Class Counsel further agree that during the term of the Decree they will not represent any Class Member who is allowed to opt out of the provisions in this Decree, in any litigation against Amtrak which arises out of, or is related to, Class Claims asserted in this case prior to the expiration of the Decree, if such representation would create a conflict of interest.

This provision shall not be interpreted to prohibit Class Counsel's continuing representation in Thornton v. Amtrak, Civil Action No. 98cv00890.

IV. GENERAL INJUNCTIVE MEASURES

A. General Provisions

1. Target Dates

The Parties recognize the importance of timely implementation of the injunctive relief provided under this Decree. The schedule set forth in this Decree is the schedule for implementing the injunctive relief, and is based on the Parties' current best estimates of the time required for such implementation. Amtrak will make good faith efforts to meet that schedule. The Parties recognize, however, that notwithstanding Amtrak's good faith efforts, it may become necessary to extend the implementation schedule for some elements of the injunctive relief. Amtrak agrees to provide reasonable advance notice, in no case fewer than 30 days, to Class Counsel in the event that Amtrak is unable to meet any aspect of the implementation schedule, and the Parties agree to cooperate in good faith in seeking to agree on necessary changes. Except with respect to the Compensation Study and the changes in compensation required by Part IV.D, if the Parties are unable to reach agreement and the extension contemplated by Amtrak for action on any item, in conjunction with any prior extensions for that item, exceeds thirty (30) percent of the total time permitted under this Decree for that item, Class Counsel may bring the matter to the Court's attention for resolution pursuant to Section XI(B) of this Decree. In the event that Amtrak does not meet its implementation target dates under this Decree, as extended pursuant to the procedures above, for any such item, the expiration of the Decree for the provisions corresponding to the implementation of such injunctive relief shall be delayed by the identical length of time.

Except with respect to Part IV.D of the Decree, the Parties shall notify the Court of any agreed modification of the schedule set forth herein that exceeds thirty (30) percent of the total time permitted for any item, and of the corresponding extension of the term for the relevant Consent Decree part. The Parties shall not be required to notify the Court of any such modification that is less than thirty (30) percent of the total time permitted under this Decree for implementation of any item.

With respect to the compensation study and required changes in compensation, the above procedures shall not apply. If the target date required under Part IV.D is not met, then on agreement of Class Counsel, not to be unreasonably withheld, an extension shall be granted; however any extension so implemented shall result in an identical extension in the term of Part IV.D of the Decree.

2. Joint Retention of Neutral Expert

Class Counsel and counsel for Amtrak jointly have retained Economic Research Services, Inc. and Joan G. Haworth, Ph.D. of Economic Research Services, Inc. as a Neutral Expert to assist in the implementation of this Decree. This Neutral Expert shall assist the Parties in developing: (1) statistical tests for monitoring compliance with this Decree; and (2) databases necessary for implementing such statistical tests. Amtrak shall be responsible for all fees and expenses relating to the Neutral Expert.

3. Outside Consultants

Wherever this Decree provides that Class Counsel shall review the credentials and qualifications of, or be consulted with respect to, an outside consultant that Amtrak intends to retain in connection with the injunctive provisions of this Decree, the following procedures shall govern: (1) Amtrak shall provide Class Counsel with the names and curricula vitae of individuals responding to its request for proposal ("RFP") or otherwise under consideration by Amtrak; (2) Amtrak shall identify its consultant of choice, taking into account suggestions, if any, by Class Counsel, and shall provide Class Counsel with the identity of the selectee and documentation or other information concerning the consultant's qualifications, credentials, and experience; (3) Class Counsel shall review Amtrak's selection and provide any comments concerning the selection to Amtrak within 10 days of receiving such information; (4) Amtrak shall consider the comments of Class Counsel in moving forward with the retention of the outside consultant; and (5) if Class Counsel raises concerns about Amtrak's consultant of choice, and Amtrak, having considered such concerns, decides to proceed with the retention of such consultant, Amtrak shall so notify Class Counsel.

4. Computation of Time

In computing any period of time prescribed or allowed under this Decree, the period of time shall be computed in terms of calendar days unless otherwise specified.

B. Job Placements

1. Application Forms and Applicant Flow Database

Within 6 months after the Injunctive Effective Date, Amtrak shall revise its existing application form as follows and implement use of the new form. Amtrak will continue to use the Job Opportunity Application Form, or similar form, for Internal Applicants for Management positions. With respect to External Applicants for Management positions, Amtrak will revise its application form to include a portion that requests External Applicants voluntarily to provide information on their race, and will revise the structure of the form as necessary, on consultation with the Neutral Expert, such that the revised form will request information concerning all matters recommended by the Neutral Expert to be included in the applicant flow computerized records.

In conjunction with the Neutral Expert, within nine (9) months after the Injunctive Effective Date, Amtrak shall develop and implement a computerized applicant flow system for recording the demographic information received from Internal and External Applicants for purposes of tracking the job placement process for Management positions at Amtrak and for monitoring purposes as described in Section IV(B)(3) below.

2. Employment Interviews

Within 6 months after the Injunctive Effective Date, Amtrak shall develop and implement standardized interview procedures and assessment forms to be used for employment interviews for Management positions as follows.

Amtrak shall develop standardized questions to be used for all applicants for a specific Management position. Interviews shall be conducted using the same questions for all candidates for the same position, insofar as feasible. The use of standardized questions shall not preclude reasonable follow-up questions by the interviewer. Standardized questions shall not be required for parallel positions across Amtrak's Strategic Business Units ("SBUs") or locations, or for parallel positions filled at different times.

Amtrak shall develop standardized interview assessment forms to be used for employment interviews for Management positions. The interview panels or individuals who interview applicants for a specific Management position shall record their assessments on the standardized interview assessment form.

Amtrak shall interview at least five (5) qualified Internal Applicants, or shall interview all qualified Internal Applicants if fewer than five (5) qualified Internal Applicants apply, for each Management position that Amtrak seeks to fill. Amtrak shall document in writing the criteria for deciding which of the qualified Internal Applicants to interview, and the rationale for selecting them. Such documentation shall be maintained by Amtrak's Human Resources Department. The requirement that at least five (5) qualified Internal Applicants be interviewed for each Management position that Amtrak seeks to fill shall not preclude Amtrak from also interviewing qualified External Applicants, and considering both Internal and External Applicants as part of the same applicant pool.

If the entire applicant pool for a particular Management position is fewer than 100, Amtrak shall notify all applicants not selected for such position of that fact within a reasonable period of time after the hiring decision has been made. All applicants who interview for a Management position, but who are not selected shall be notified of that fact within a reasonable period of time regardless of the number of applicants interviewed. Amtrak shall maintain records of applications, interviews, and selections for Management positions for a minimum of 2 years.

3. Monitoring of Job Placements

Amtrak shall record in computer-readable format the race of applicants selected for interviews for Management positions that it seeks to fill, and the race of the persons ultimately selected to fill such positions, to the extent that applicants provide information concerning their race to Amtrak. Amtrak shall commence recording this data on or before July 1, 2000. Beginning with the six-month period that begins on July 1, 2000, Amtrak shall review this placement data every six months to determine whether there is a Statistically Significant disparity between the offer rate for qualified white applicants and the offer rate for qualified African American applicants, or the rate at which qualified African Americans are selected for interviews and the rate at which qualified whites are selected for interviews, controlling for appropriate factors. The Neutral Expert shall assist the Parties in determining the factors to be controlled for, and the formula to be used to determine if Statistically Significant disparities exist.

If, according to the formula devised by the Neutral Expert, Amtrak finds that its interview selection process has Statistically Significant adverse impact on African Americans during the previous six-month period, and if its hiring process has a Statistically Significant adverse impact on African Americans, then for Management positions that Amtrak seeks to fill during at least the next two consecutive six-month periods, Amtrak will ensure that the percentage of African Americans among those interviewed equals or exceeds the percentage of African Americans in the qualified applicant pool until there is no Statistically Significant disparity between the rate at which African Americans are offered jobs and their presence in the qualified African American pool.

C. Reductions in Force and Priority Consideration

During the term of this Decree, if Amtrak intends to implement a reduction in force ("RIF"), Amtrak will perform an analysis of the RIF to determine if it will have a disparate impact on African American Management employees. This analysis shall be provided to Class Counsel at least 30 days prior to Amtrak's issuance of the notice of RIF. This disparate impact analysis shall be distinct from any analysis that is performed by the Amtrak Law Department in the course of its normal duties.

The analysis shall consist of a comparison of the percentage of African American Management employees whose jobs are scheduled for elimination by the RIF, to the percentage of African American Management employees in the pool of employees potentially affected by the RIF. If the percentage of African American Management employees in the group of employees whose jobs are scheduled for elimination by the RIF exceeds the percentage of African American Management employees in the pool of employees potentially affected by the RIF (as defined by organizational unit and level), then the following shall apply:

1. Amtrak shall prepare a written justification for the racially disparate impact of the RIF, which shall be provided to Class Counsel at least 25 days prior to implementation of the RIF;

2. For a period of six months from the date of the notice of the RIF, African American Management employees whose jobs were eliminated as a result of the RIF, and who meet the criteria set forth in Paragraph 2(b) below, shall receive "priority consideration" for posted Management positions for which they apply.

a. "Priority consideration" shall mean that African American Management employees whose jobs were eliminated as a result of the RIF shall be interviewed for any Management position for which that person applies, and for which that person meets the minimum job qualifications.

b. African American Management employees whose jobs were eliminated as a result of the RIF shall qualify for "priority consideration" as defined above only if:

(1) they have worked for Amtrak for at least one year prior to the date of the notice of the RIF;

(2) they have not received an unsatisfactory overall score (or the functional equivalent) on either of their two most recent performance appraisals (except that if they have not been employed at Amtrak long enough to have received two performance appraisal ratings, any unsatisfactory rating shall preclude the employee from "priority consideration"); and

(3) within the past two years they have not received any discipline more severe than a written warning.

3. Four months from the date of the notice of RIF, Amtrak shall conduct an analysis of the rates at which African American Management employees whose jobs were eliminated by the RIF were offered jobs and the rate at which white Management employees whose jobs were eliminated by the same RIF were offered jobs. This analysis shall be a simple percentage analysis based on a review of employees in "comparable positions." "Comparable positions" shall be defined based on pay rates at Amtrak, which are currently defined in terms of "bands" and "zones." An offer for a non-Management position within Amtrak following a RIF shall not be considered an offer for a replacement job for purposes of the racial impact analysis conducted under this provision. If the analysis conducted pursuant to this provision shows that the offer rate for white Management employees whose jobs were eliminated by the RIF exceeds the offer rate for African American Management employees whose jobs were eliminated by the RIF, then the African American Management employees whose jobs were eliminated as a result of the RIF shall receive "enhanced priority consideration" for Management positions for which they apply during the 6 to 12 month period following the date of the notice of the RIF.

a. "Enhanced priority consideration" shall mean that African American Management employees whose jobs were eliminated by the RIF shall continue to receive "priority consideration" with respect to interviews for Management positions as described in Section 2 (a)(c) above and, in addition, they shall be selected for the Management position for which they interviewed if: (1) they are the best qualified African American applicant; and (2) no "clearly superior" white applicant is selected for the position.

b. "Clearly superior" shall mean that Amtrak can demonstrate that the successful white candidate's overall qualifications significantly exceed those of the African American candidate entitled to enhanced priority consideration based on a comparison of reasonable and objective selection factors for the specific position, including relevant experience, work history, relevant education, relevant expertise, and additional relevant qualifications beyond the minimal qualifications for the position.

Amtrak shall allow Class Counsel to have access to all non-privileged documentation relating to Amtrak's final selection of the positions that will be eliminated as a result of a RIF. Class Counsel may challenge a RIF in advance of the implementation of the RIF on the ground that it will have a disparate impact on African American Management employees, or on the ground that Amtrak's selection of the positions to be eliminated by the RIF is racially motivated, by referring the matter in writing to the Court within 10 days of receiving Amtrak's disparate impact analysis referenced above. Amtrak shall have 10 days to file a response to Class Counsel's submission. If Class Counsel's challenge to the RIF is upheld, Amtrak shall not implement the RIF as planned.

D. Compensation

1. Compensation Study

Within 60 days of the completion of the revisions to the job descriptions, as set forth in Section IV(E) of this Decree, Amtrak shall hire an outside consultant to perform a study of the salaries of all employees in Management positions, which shall consider, if appropriate, the experience, prior salary, abilities, performance appraisals, geographic location, SBU, and longevity of each employee, and other generally accepted factors relied on by compensation specialists. The study shall also consider market rates of compensation for persons holding similar positions, if appropriate. Market rates, however, shall be considered only for the purposes of internal comparisons between various Amtrak positions, and shall not be considered for the purposes of general or overall increases in the compensation of Amtrak Management employees. Class Counsel shall have the opportunity to meet with the consultant before the consultant completes his or her report to discuss the factors the consultant intends to take into account in analyzing the appropriateness of salaries, how the consultant intends to take those factors into account, and how the consultant will identify comparable positions. The compensation study, and any reports or recommendations concerning the same, shall be completed within 6 months of the completion of the revisions to the job descriptions, as set forth in Section IV(E) of this Decree. Amtrak does not commit through the compensation study: (1) to adjust the salaries of Amtrak Management employees to market rates; (2) to limit starting salaries of new Management employees based on compensation paid to existing Amtrak Management employees; or (3) to increase periodically the salaries of Amtrak's Management employees.

Amtrak shall maintain a computerized database of all salaries of Management employees. The computerized database shall be maintained by the Human Resources Department.

2. Adjustments to Salaries if There Are Race-based Disparities

If the compensation study shows that there are disparities in salaries between African American Management employees and white employees in comparable positions, to the disadvantage of African American Management employees, Amtrak will increase the compensation of African American Management employees to eliminate any racial disparities. Prospective salary adjustments, if any need to be made, shall be made within 3 months of the completion of the compensation study. Within 30 days after completing the adjustments, Amtrak shall provide Class Counsel with a final report identifying all such disparities and adjustments and justifications for them. The report containing this information, as well as the race of the employees, shall be in computer-readable format. Class Counsel may challenge the adjustments, or lack thereof, pursuant to the procedures set forth in Part XI of this Decree.

E. Job Descriptions and Qualifications

1. Revision of Job Descriptions

Within 2 years after the Injunctive Effective Date, Amtrak shall review and revise all job descriptions for Management positions. At least forty percent (40%) of all job descriptions for Management positions shall be reviewed and revised within 1 year of the Injunctive Effective Date.

Amtrak shall hire an employee ("internal analyst"), or an outside consultant, to review and revise the job descriptions for Management employees. If Amtrak decides to hire an internal analyst it shall so notify Class Counsel. Class Counsel may provide Amtrak's counsel with a list of job analysts who may serve as a source for referrals for the internal analyst position. Amtrak shall consider any referrals that it receives from Class Counsel or from the job analysts identified by Class Counsel. Prior to hiring an internal analyst, Amtrak shall provide Class Counsel with a copy of the resume of the person that Amtrak has decided to hire as an internal analyst and permit them a reasonable period for comment. If Amtrak decides to hire an internal analyst, Amtrak will also hire sufficient staff and/or short term consultants to be able to complete the review and revision of job specifications within the 2-year requirement under this Decree. If Amtrak decides to retain an outside consultant to review and revise the job descriptions of Management employees, the procedures for hiring outside consultants that are set forth in Section IV(A)(3) shall apply.

The revised job specifications or descriptions shall contain requirements or qualifications that Amtrak believes are necessary to satisfactory job performance. No specifications or job descriptions shall include provisions that are crafted to make only one or several favored persons qualified to fill the position. Amtrak shall allow Class Counsel to have access to the revised job specifications.

2. Job Postings

Job descriptions shall be posted with any notice of a position to be filled, and shall be available for review by any applicants for a position. Vacancies will be posted for a full 7 days, pursuant to Amtrak procedures. If an accretion in job duties for a position results in a job moving to a new salary band and zone, the position must be reposted and refilled and incumbents in such position shall remain in the position pending the refilling of the position.

The first time that a position is posted based on a revised job description, the posting notice, and the telephone message on the Amtrak job line shall: (a) include a statement that indicates that the posting is based on a revised job description; (b) include a summary of any changes in the job qualifications included in the revised job description; (c) identify a location where the revised and old descriptions may be reviewed, and a telephone number that an employee may call to obtain copies of the revised and old descriptions; and (d) include a message that informs the caller that within 24 hours of a request, the new job description and posting will be faxed or emailed to an employee, or if the employee is in a location where a facsimile or email is not available, the new job description and posting will be read to the employee over the telephone. Amtrak shall act in conformity with such message.

3. Appeal Process

An Internal Applicant for a position and an incumbent employee in a position may challenge a job description in the following circumstances.

Internal Applicants shall have the ability to challenge a job description on the ground that it was crafted to make only one or several favored persons qualified for the position covered by the job description. Absent informal resolution of claims, the procedure for asserting a challenge to the description shall be as follows:

a. The Internal Applicant must file a written challenge with the Vice President of Human Resources ("VP of HR") within the 7-day period provided by Amtrak for responding to a posted job vacancy.

b. The VP of HR shall have 10 business days from the date that the challenge is received to resolve or rule on the challenge.

c. If the VP of HR cannot resolve the challenge or overrules the challenge, and the Internal Applicant's claim is that the crafting of the job description was racially motivated, then the Internal Applicant shall have 7 business days from the day that he/she receives notice of the ruling by the VP of HR to file a written appeal with the Senior Director, EEO Resolution. If the Internal Applicant's claim is not based on an allegation of racial motivation, the decision of the VP of HR shall be the final decision.

d. The Senior Director, EEO Resolution shall have 20 business days from the day that the written appeal is received to resolve or decide the appeal.

e. If the VP of HR or the Senior Director, EEO Resolution determines that the challenged job description was crafted to make only one or several favored persons qualified for the position covered by the job description, Amtrak shall revise the job description, and vacate, repost, and refill the position.

f. At any time during the course of the procedures set forth above, the employee and Amtrak may settle the employee's claims without exhausting such procedures.

If a job description for a position is revised, the incumbent employee in that position may challenge the revised job description. Absent informal resolution of such claims, the procedure for an incumbent employee to challenge a revised job description shall be as follows:

a. Amtrak shall notify an incumbent in a position whenever the job description for that position has been revised. Such notice shall be in writing and shall be mailed to the incumbent, along with a copy of the revised job description, within 30 days after the revision in the job description has been made.

b. The incumbent may challenge the revised job description by filing a written challenge with the VP of HR within 7 days of receiving the notice of, and a copy of, the revised description.

c. The VP of HR shall have 10 business days from the day the challenge is received to resolve or rule on the challenge.

d. If the VP of HR cannot resolve the challenge, or overrules the challenge, an incumbent who claims that the revisions to the job description for the incumbent's position were racially motivated shall have 7 business days from receiving the ruling by VP of HR to file an appeal with the Senior Director, EEO Resolution. If the incumbent employee's claim is not based on an allegation of racial motivation, the decision of the VP of HR shall be the final decision.

e. The Senior Director, EEO Resolution will have 20 business days from receiving the appeal to resolve or to rule on the appeal.

f. If the VP of HR or the Senior Director, EEO Resolution upholds the challenge, the old job description shall remain in effect until any revisions to such job description can withstand challenge by the incumbent employee.

g. At any time during the course of the procedures set forth above, the employee and Amtrak may settle the employee's claims without exhausting such procedures.

F. Performance Appraisal System

1. Revising The System

Within 1 year of the Injunctive Effective Date Amtrak shall develop and implement a revised performance appraisal system. The performance appraisal system shall be revised with the assistance of an outside consultant. Amtrak has selected an outside consultant in connection with its Service Standards initiative and intends to use this consultant to perform the requirements of this section of the Decree. Amtrak has provided Class Counsel with information and materials concerning the consultant that Amtrak has selected. If, however, Amtrak decides to use another consultant to perform the requirements of this part of the Decree, the selection of such consultant shall be governed by the provisions in part IV(A)(3) of this Decree.

2. The Revised System

The revised performance appraisal system may, but need not, include elements of the current system and/or proposals for change made before the Injunctive Effective Date. The revised system shall include at least annual reviews of Class Members. Interim reviews are also permissible. A component of the performance appraisal shall be an assessment of an employee's performance with respect to equal employment opportunity issues ("EEO component"). No supervisor shall be eligible for a promotion for a period of one-year following the unsatisfactory appraisal if he/she has an unsatisfactory rating (or functional equivalent) on the EEO component of his/her performance appraisal. The new Amtrak EEO Resolution Unit shall review all ratings of those managers or supervisors who have had complaints filed against them in the last year to ensure that the performance appraisals fairly and accurately reflect EEO complaints that have been investigated by the Unit and found not to be frivolous. In conjunction with the implementation of the revised performance appraisal system, Amtrak shall train all managers who conduct performance appraisals regarding the new system.

3. Review for Statistically Significant Disparity

Amtrak shall computerize the revised performance appraisal system. The Parties will work with the Neutral Expert to develop the fields that should be included in the system for statistical monitoring.

Using the formula and fields devised by the Neutral Expert, Amtrak's Director, Diversity Monitoring shall supervise an annual review of performance evaluation scores of Management employees to determine whether there is a Statistically Significant disparity between the overall scores of African American and white Management employees, controlling for appropriate factors, if any, that are used in the database. In performing the review itself, the Director, Diversity Monitoring may request assistance from the Neutral Expert. Based on this review, the Director, Diversity Monitoring may make recommendations to the VP of Business Diversity, and the President of Amtrak for reducing disparity. The results of this review, and any recommendations regarding the same, shall be provided to Class Counsel. Based on a review of such information, Class Counsel may make recommendations to Amtrak for further remedial action. If Class Counsel makes recommendations to Amtrak for further remedial action, Amtrak shall have 30 days to respond to such recommendations. If Amtrak and Class Counsel do not reach agreement on resolution of such recommendations, Class Counsel may petition the Court for enforcement pursuant to the provisions in Section X of this Decree.

G. Training

1. Internal and External Training Opportunities

In addition to any other training specified in this Decree, Amtrak shall implement the following training policies and programs with respect to Management positions. Amtrak shall provide comparable opportunities for internal and external training to Management employees who hold positions in the same department with similar job duties. In allocating training opportunities, Amtrak may give weight to qualifications, experience, education, performance, and other reasonable, non-discriminatory factors.

In order to assess whether comparable training opportunities are being provided, within 6 months of the Injunctive Effective Date, Amtrak shall develop an authorization form for all training requests (on-site and off-site) that must be filled out and signed by any Management employee requesting to attend a training program. The Management employee shall submit the form to his/her supervisor. The form shall direct the supervisor to indicate whether the request for training is approved or disapproved. If a supervisor disapproves a request for training, the form shall also direct the supervisor to indicate the reasons for disapproval. The completed forms shall be maintained by the Human Resource Department.

Within 9 months of the Injunctive Effective Date, Amtrak shall implement and maintain a computerized database of all requests made by employees for internal and external training and all training actually provided to Management employees. Management employees shall receive an annual printout of the training database for themselves and for all Management employees under their supervision.

In order to ensure that all employees are made aware of training opportunities, within 6 months after the Injunctive Effective Date, Amtrak shall distribute to all Management employees and all non-Management supervisors copies of the Amtrak booklet, or similar publication, that summarizes available training courses, and a written schedule that shall be updated and redistributed every six (6) months until Amtrak institutes an on-line version of the booklet and schedule. Other non-Management employees may obtain a copy of the training booklet from the Human Resources Department on request.

Within nine (9) months after the Injunctive Effective Date, Amtrak shall implement an on-line version of the training booklet and the schedule of training classes. The booklet and on-line information shall advise employees of the possibility of external training, and shall identify an individual in the Human Resources Department who can answer questions regarding external training.

2. Career Counseling

Amtrak shall implement a career counseling program for Management employees. Within one year after the Injunctive Effective Date, Amtrak shall implement one half-time position responsible for career counseling of Management employees. Within two years of the Injunctive Effective Date, Amtrak shall implement one full-time position responsible for career counseling for Management employees. The position shall be located in the Human Resources Department in Amtrak's Corporate headquarters, but such position shall be available to provide career counseling to Management employees nationwide through telephone, on-line, and personal communications. The position shall require familiarity with Amtrak's job specifications and shall be responsible for identifying appropriate training needed by employees for advancement to and within Amtrak Management positions.

3. Statistical Review

Beginning on January 1, 2002, Amtrak's Director, Diversity Monitoring (or the outside consultant responsible for monitoring as described in Section IV(I)(1) of this Decree) shall supervise an annual review of the training data from the prior year, and as described above, to determine whether there is a Statistically Significant disparity between the training opportunities provided to African American Management employees and white Management employees, controlling for appropriate factors that are used in the database, including the number of requests made by employees in each category. The statistical analysis shall be performed on a company-wide basis and shall also be conducted separately within the 3 SBUs of Amtrak, as well as within the Corporate Service Center. Amtrak shall conduct the review pursuant to the formula and fields devised by the Neutral Expert. The Neutral Expert may also be consulted with regard to and/or retained by Amtrak to conduct the actual review.

Based on the review of training data described above, the Director, Diversity Monitoring may make recommendations for reducing any disparity that disadvantages African American Management employees to the VP of Business Diversity. The results of this review and any recommendations shall be provided to Class Counsel. Based on a review of this information, Class Counsel may make recommendations to Amtrak for further remedial action with respect to training. If Class Counsel makes any recommendations for further remedial action with respect to training, Amtrak shall have 30 days to respond to such recommendations. If Amtrak and Class Counsel do not reach agreement on resolution of such recommendations, Class Counsel may petition the Court for enforcement pursuant to the provisions of Section X of this Decree.

H. Discipline

1. Creation of an Appeal Board

Within 6 months after the Injunctive Effective Date, Amtrak shall create an Appeal Board, and implement procedures related to such Board, to handle appeals from African American Management employees who are terminated from their employment at Amtrak through formal or informal disciplinary actions and allege that the termination was based on race. "Formal disciplinary action" refers to disciplinary termination. "Informal disciplinary action" includes, but is not limited to, a request for resignation or retirement, or constructive discharge. The Appeal Board shall be composed of Amtrak's Vice Presidents of Business Diversity and Human Resources, and the Vice President and General Counsel.

2. Appeal Procedures

The procedure for requesting an appeal with the Appeal Board to review a termination based on a formal or informal disciplinary action and an allegation that such termination was based on race shall be as follows. A Management employee shall initiate an appeal to the Board to challenge formal or informal disciplinary action involving termination by forwarding a written request for review of the disciplinary action to the Board. The time for requesting an appeal runs from the date that the employee receives notice of the termination, until 10 days after the effective date of the termination. After receiving notice of the appeal, the Board shall provide the employee with an opportunity to present his/her position to the Board in person, or through a representative, within 30 days of the filing of the appeal. The employee shall have the right to submit documents and written statements to the Board in support of his/her position, and shall have the right to make a presentation before the Board in person or through a representative. This process shall provide for an opportunity to be heard, but shall not be an evidentiary hearing. The Board may use investigators from the EEO Resolution Unit to conduct an investigation of the facts presented by the employee in the course of the Appeal. The Board shall make a decision on the appeal within 60 days of receiving the written request for appeal. The Board can affirm, modify or reverse any disciplinary action involving termination. The Board shall also have the power to award back pay. Amtrak shall develop procedures and guidelines consistent with the above to govern the deliberations of the Appeal Board.

The Board decision shall be final Amtrak action with respect to the challenged discipline. The Board process shall be confidential. There shall be no negative consequences to an employee for using the Appeal Board process, although Amtrak may make as a condition of payment of severance, the execution of a waiver of the Appeal Board process by the employee. The waiver form and the substantive content of the waiver shall be approved by Amtrak's Vice Presidents of Business Diversity and Human Resources and by the Vice President and General Counsel before it is presented to an employee for signature.

3. Monitoring of Impact of Disciplinary Process

Amtrak shall maintain a computerized database of all disciplinary actions taken against Management employees. Amtrak shall allow Class Counsel to have access to this database. Amtrak shall also maintain a computerized database and copies of the records of all cases filed before the Appeal Board. Amtrak shall allow Class Counsel to have access to this database and the copies of the records.

I. Equal Employment Opportunity

1. Reorganization of the Amtrak EEO Function

Amtrak has reorganized the management of its equal employment opportunity ("EEO") complaint function and has advised Class Counsel of the changes that have been made. This Decree embodies the commitments relating to the maintenance of certain aspects of the new organizational structure.

Amtrak shall maintain a Director position, entitled Senior Director, EEO Resolution or similar title (e.g. Director, Employee Resolution), which shall have responsibility for managing the internal EEO complaint procedure within Amtrak. Amtrak shall use an Amtrak Director position, entitled Director, Diversity Monitoring or similar title, or an outside consultant, to monitor specific EEO functions identified in this Decree. If Amtrak decides to retain an outside consultant to be responsible for this monitoring position, the outside consultant shall be selected in accordance with the provisions in Section IV(A)(3) of this Decree. The Director, Diversity Monitoring, or the outside consultant (if one is selected) may also be given broader duties with respect to compliance with this Decree.

The Senior Director, EEO Resolution and the Director, Diversity Monitoring (or the monitoring consultant, if one is selected) shall report to a Vice President, titled Vice President, Business Diversity and Strategic Initiatives or similar title ("VP Business Diversity"), which shall have responsibility for Amtrak's EEO and diversity functions. The VP Business Diversity; the Senior Director, EEO Resolution; and Director, Diversity Monitoring shall have the power to develop and implement, on the approval of the President of Amtrak, recommendations with respect to EEO and diversity issues.

Amtrak shall implement a protocol for referral of employee relations complaints to the EEO Resolution Unit, when the employee relations complaint presents potential discrimination issues. Responsibility for defending Amtrak against discrimination complaints or charges filed with federal, state, or local agencies ("external EEO complaints") shall remain in the Amtrak Law Department. EEO investigators in the Law Department shall be responsible for conducting privileged investigations of external EEO complaints. Amtrak shall develop a protocol for the communication of information between the EEO Resolution Unit and the Law Department, for purposes of: defining permissible communications; defining the scope of the attorney-client privilege or work product protection; and ensuring the independence of the EEO Resolution Unit investigations.

Amtrak shall staff the EEO Resolution Unit with a sufficient number of investigators to meet all time lines under this Decree relating to internal EEO functions.

2. Internal Complaint Procedure

Amtrak shall revise its internal EEO complaint procedure to provide for prompt investigation and resolution, where possible, of internal EEO complaints. Amtrak and Class Counsel shall agree on a policy statement of rights of employees to be distributed annually to all employees, which shall include a description of the internal complaint procedure. Amtrak shall implement procedures for the filing of internal EEO complaints in writing, in person, by e-mail, or by telephone. Amtrak shall provide employees with written confirmation of the filing of an internal EEO complaint, and shall provide them with notice of the applicable deadlines for processing internal and external claims.

All complaints filed under the internal EEO complaint procedure or referred from the Employee Relations Department, shall be investigated and processed to closure within 90 days of the date that the internal complaint is filed. Internal EEO investigators in the Employee Resolution Unit shall attempt the early resolution of all complaints, within 30 days of the complaint being filed, through discussions with the affected employee and their department supervision.

Within 90 days of the complaint being filed, the complaint shall be closed. The closed complaint file shall include: (1) a record of facts that were developed by the investigation conducted by the internal EEO investigator, (2) a summary of resolution efforts, and (3) any recommendations for resolution or further action. Recommendations for resolution may include recommendations for sanctions and discipline, up to and including termination, of employees for performance or conduct related to EEO issues. Such recommendations shall be made to those managers who have the authority to impose such sanctions on the employees involved in the situation or circumstances that are the subject of the complaint. The EEO Resolution Unit shall make no findings of a violation or non-violation. The EEO Resolution Unit shall provide a written notice of the closure, including a summary or recommendations for action to the complainant. The internal EEO Office will maintain a confidential, non-privileged written record of all investigations.

On closure, the complainant and Class Counsel may review a complete copy of the EEO Resolution Unit record, on the condition that they sign a confidentiality agreement that will preclude the use of the information for purposes other than case processing of the employee's claim, or for compliance with this Decree. Within 10 days of the notice of closure, an employee who is dissatisfied with the processing of a complaint may request a review by the Senior Director, EEO Resolution Unit. Upon request by the complaining employee, the Senior Director, EEO Resolution shall conduct a review of the employee's complaint and meet with the complainant. For complainants located at the Corporate Service Center or in the Northeast Corridor, such meeting shall be in person. For Amtrak West or Intercity complaints, the meetings may be conducted via conference call. The Senior Director, EEO Resolution shall have the authority to make recommendations for resolution of complaints. The Senior Director, EEO Resolution shall conduct the meeting and review, and make any recommendations for resolution or further action within 60 days of the date of closure of the claim by the internal EEO investigator.

A manager who receives a recommendation from the EEO Resolution Unit for discipline of a subordinate employee as a result of an internal EEO investigation shall have 10 days to accept or reject the recommendation. If the recommendation is rejected, the manager will provide his/her reasons for rejecting the recommendation in writing to the VP Business Diversity, the Vice President of Human Resources, and the Vice President and General Counsel. If the manager fails to act within the 10-day period, the Senior Director, EEO Resolution will so report to the three Vice Presidents referenced above. The three Vice Presidents shall have 15 days from the date they receive a manager's written notice of rejection of a recommendation, or where the manager has not taken any action, 15 days from receiving a report from the Senior Director, EEO Resolution, to take whatever action they deem appropriate.

At the close of each investigation, the internal EEO Office will provide each complainant with an evaluation form to determine the complainant's level of satisfaction with the processes and performance of the EEO Office.

The EEO Resolution Unit shall have the authority and the responsibility to investigate patterns and practices of conduct by individuals or departments based on complaints or other information that comes to the attention of the EEO Resolution Unit. An employee's involvement in three or more separate incidents resulting in non-frivolous EEO complaints within any two-year period, regardless of whether the employee was alleged to be the principal wrongdoer in any complaint, shall be grounds for initiating an investigation.

Every three years the EEO Resolution Unit shall conduct an audit of each department or organizational unit within Amtrak based on the history of EEO complaints from employees in the department or organizational unit and other EEO-related information. The EEO Resolution Unit shall report the results of the audit to the manager responsible for the organizational unit or department. Further, pursuant to the power of the Vice-President, the Office of Business Diversity may make recommendations and/ or implement changes in the department on approval of Amtrak's President with respect to EEO and diversity issues.

3. Training

Managers and supervisors of Class employees shall be trained on EEO issues within one year after the Injunctive Effective Date. Such managers and supervisors shall be given a refresher training course at least once every 3 years. Subjects for the training course shall include applicable EEO laws, Amtrak's internal and external EEO complaint procedures, and Consent Decree obligations. EEO Resolution Unit investigators shall be given initial and annual training concerning EEO laws, Consent Decree requirements, investigation, and mediation techniques.

V. SETTLEMENT FUND

A. Creation and Administration of Fund

1. Creation and Purpose

For the purpose of satisfying and settling all of the Eligible Claims of all named Plaintiffs, Class Members, and Class Counsel, as those terms are defined in Part III of the Decree, Amtrak shall deposit into the Settlement Fund (the "Fund"): 1) the sum of Four Million Dollars ($4,000,000), on or before October 15, 1999; and 2) the sum of Four Million Dollars ($4,000,000), plus six percent (6%) interest compounded monthly from October 15, 1999 until the date of deposit, on or before November 15, 2000. The Fund shall be established as a qualified Settlement Fund under Section 468B of the Internal Revenue Code and shall be administered by Michael Lieder and Lawrence Schaefer ("the Administrators") under the Court's supervision in accordance with Administrative Order No.1.

The two above deposits are the sole payments that Amtrak shall be required to make to settle this case and the foregoing Claims, except with respect to: 1) published notice (Section VIII.C); 2) consulting fees requisite to implementation of the Decree including for the Neutral Expert; 3) fees for mediators and/or arbitrators relating to Job Relief Process (Section VII.B) and enforcement matters (Section XII); and 4) employer taxes (Section II.C of Implementation Order No. 1). Nothing in the foregoing sentence, however, shall release Amtrak from expending the necessary resources to implement internally the injunctive measures mandated by Section IV of the Decree. From the deposits and any income earned thereon, Plaintiffs and Class Members may receive payments, Class Counsel shall be paid all fees and reimbursed for expenses incurred, except as set forth immediately above. Tax reserves and an appeal Fund shall be created and set aside before allocating the Fund among eligible Claimants or Payees, all in accordance with Administrative Order No. 1, previously approved by the Court and the terms of which are incorporated herein and made a part of this Decree.

The Portion of the Fund designated to pay the Claims of the Plaintiffs and Class Members shall consist of Five Million Dollars ($5,000,000) and any income thereon and shall be known as the "Claims Fund." The Portion of the Fund designated to pay to and reimburse Class Counsel their reasonable fees, expenses and costs, shall be known as the "Monitoring Fund." The Monitoring Fund shall by agreement consist of Three Million Dollars ($3,000,000) and any income thereon. Such income as to both Portions shall include both the interest payable by Amtrak as provided above and the income earned by the Fund pending distribution from the Fund. Both Portions shall be governed by Administrative Order No. 1. The Administrators shall invest both Portions of the Fund in interest-bearing United States Treasury securities, securities of agencies of the United States backed by the full faith and credit of the United States, and/or Repurchase Agreements, pending distribution from the Fund.

The Monitoring Fund shall cover fees, costs, and expenses, whether previously incurred in connection with this litigation or to be incurred at any time including, but not limited to, those relating to: (1) the administration of the Claims Resolution Process and the Claims Fund, including distribution of the Claims Fund to Plaintiffs and Class Members and related matters; (2) administration of the Monitoring Fund and distributions to Payees; (3) Plaintiffs' half of all past fees, costs and expenses of ADR Associates incurred during the mediation of this dispute; (4) all attorneys' fees, costs and expenses incurred or to be incurred by Class Counsel for any purpose in connection with the case, including, but not limited to, those relating to (a) finalization of the Decree, (b) obtaining approval of the Decree by the Court and in any related appeal proceedings or defense of the Decree, (c) monitoring of implementation of the Decree, (d) resolution of unresolved Decree issues, including Class Members' Job Relief, by the Parties, the Court, an arbitrator or otherwise, and (e) enforcement of the Decree. Notwithstanding the above, attorneys' fees, costs and expenses incurred by any person objecting to, or making a collateral or direct attack on the Decree or on the actions of the Administrators of the Fund, shall be borne by that person and shall not be chargeable to either Amtrak or the Fund.

The Fund, including both of its subparts, shall irrevocably vest in the Court, through its agents the Administrators, as defined in Administrative Order No. 1 on the Non-Injunctive Effective Date. If, by whatever means, the Decree does not become a final judgment, the entire Fund and any interest thereon shall revert to Amtrak.

2. Administrators' Administrative Responsibilities

In administering the Fund, the Administrators shall be bound by the terms of the Court's Administrative Order No. 1, submitted on the date of preliminary approval of the Decree, as those orders may in the future be supplemented or amended by the Court to administer and carry out the purposes of the Decree, provided that no such supplementation or amendment shall alter the terms of the Decree, including Amtrak's payment obligations.

B . CLAIMS FILING PROCEDURES FOR SETTLEMENT OF CLAIMS OF PLAINTIFFS AND CLASS MEMBERS

Following preliminary approval of the Decree, Class Counsel was obligated to mail a Claim Form to every known Class Member at his/her last known address, if available. Class Counsel also has been obligated to make Claim Forms available to other Class Members at their request.

The signed Claim Forms submitted in accordance with the procedures set forth on the Claim Form to the Administrators by Class Members as defined in the Decree, Section III.A & D, and, including named Plaintiffs, and postmarked or hand delivered by October 29, 1999, shall be processed and reviewed by the Administrators. The Administrators shall recommend monetary awards from the Fund to the Court under seal, with a copy to outside counsel for Amtrak. Underlying Claim Forms prepared by Class Members may be provided to Amtrak only if so ordered by the Court, or by consent of Class Counsel, to Amtrak's outside counsel.

In order to promote both fairness and efficiency, each Claim will be awarded points after review and after such verification as the Administrators deem appropriate of the information provided on the Claim Form. Verification may include, among other things, checking the relevant information on computerized databases maintained by the Administrators and Claimants' tax returns. The details of the point system to be applied shall be provided to Amtrak, and are subject to Court approval on recommendation by Class Counsel after Claims are received. The point system shall be applied uniformly, will not be discretionary after approval and may be amended only by Court Order. The total points awarded to all Claimants will be aggregated, and each Claimant's proportionate share of the total points will be determined. The Claimant shall then be allocated a commensurate proportion of the Claims Fund. Subject to Court approval, a Claimant may be required to obtain a minimum number of points to qualify for a monetary award. All monetary awards shall be subject to the review and approval of the Court before disbursement. All Class Members receiving awards will be required to keep the amount of the awards confidential from everyone except Class Counsel, or any attorney, tax or financial advisor representing them or members of their immediate family.

Points will be awarded to Plaintiffs and Class Members who qualify as Management employees, based on such factors as: (1) length of service with Amtrak; (2) strength of Claim and amount of damages from alleged denial of advancement opportunity (Claims based on initial assignment, promotion and transfer decisions); (3) strength of Claim and amount of damages from alleged denial of compensation (Claims based on disparities in pay); (4) strength of Claim and amount of damages from discipline imposed (Claims based on suspension or termination decisions); (5) strength of Claim and amount of damages from alleged racially offensive conduct or language; and (6) contributions to the prosecution of the litigation. Claimed losses resulting from alleged unfair performance appraisals, inadequate training, or disciplinary action less than suspension or termination will be treated as losses flowing from any resulting personnel actions such as lost promotions. Points will be awarded to applicants for Management positions based on such factors as: (1) pay grade of job sought; (2) demonstrated suitability and/or qualification for the job sought; (3) contribution to the prosecution of the litigation; and (4) strength of Claim.

However, External Applicants shall in no circumstance receive more than ten thousand dollars ($10,000) from the Fund. The Administrators may award additional points to Claimants who supply corroborating documentation for their losses.

Awards shall be made from the Claims Portion of each installment paid by Amtrak to the Fund. The awards made to Plaintiffs and Class members from the first installment shall be deemed 27% compensatory, 53% backpay, and 20% pre-judgment interest. The awards made to Plaintiffs and the Class Members from the second installment shall be deemed 25% compensatory, 50% backpay, and 25% pre-judgment interest. No award paid to any Plaintiff or Class Member pursuant to the Decree shall be taken into account in determining the amount of or eligibility for any pension, retirement, or other benefits from Amtrak.

However, any Class Member who released any of his/her Claims that would otherwise be covered by this Decree, or obtained a final judicial determination of any of his/her Claims that would otherwise be covered by this Decree, is not eligible to receive an award from the Fund for those Claims under these procedures.

VI. JOB RELIEF

A. ASSERTIONS OF CLAIMS FOR JOB RELIEF

Plaintiffs and Class Members shall be entitled to assert claims for specific Job Relief as defined below, and shall be awarded such relief as the Parties may agree to. In the event the Parties are unable to agree to resolve any such claims, the Plaintiffs or Class Members shall be entitled to mediate, and thereafter to arbitrate, their claims for Job Relief in accordance with the procedures set forth below. The Job Relief Process is interrelated with the monetary awards procedure in that participants in the Job Relief Process shall receive reduced monetary awards as set forth below. A negative arbitration ruling controlling a participant's claim, however, shall not affect that person's right to accumulate points relating to other types of claims in the Claims Resolution Process set forth in Section V.B.

1. Limitations on Individual Participation

In order to participate in the Job Relief Process, Job Relief Claims must: (a) involve discrimination in hiring, promotion, demotion or termination; (b) entail a demonstrable increase in the Claimant's current annual salary of at least five thousand dollars ($5,000); and (c) if a hiring claim, be submitted by an Internal Applicant rather than an External Applicant.

2. Consultation Period and Voidability of Settlement

Class Counsel shall have thirty (30) days following the deadline for filing Claim and Job Relief Election Forms (the "Claims Consultation Period") to evaluate the Eligible Job Claims and, consistent with their attorney-client obligations, counsel persons filing Job Relief Election Forms concerning the strength of their Job Relief and monetary claims and the desirability of pursuing the former.

Within 10 days of the Consultation Period described in Section VII(A)(2) above, Class Counsel shall notify Amtrak of the number of Class Members who have chosen to participate in the Job Relief process under this Decree. If more than 45 Class Members have elected to participate in the Job Relief process, Amtrak may, within fifteen days of receiving such notice, withdraw from this Decree and declare the Settlement null and void.

3. Reduction in Monetary Relief

Job Relief Claimants shall have deducted from their monetary claim, if any, all points allocated to the claim for which Job Relief is sought, plus twenty-five percent (25%) of all points allocated for other claims under the procedure set forth in Administrative Order No. 1.

B. JOB RELIEF PROCEDURES

1. Negotiation

Within ten (10) days after the Consultation Period, Class Counsel shall notify Amtrak of all individuals seeking Job Relief and the nature of their claims. Thereafter, Class Counsel and counsel for Amtrak shall consult to discern which claims are susceptible to resolution through negotiation. Within thirty (30) days thereafter, Amtrak and Class Counsel shall attempt negotiation of each such claim.

2. Mediation

If unsupervised negotiation of a claim does not succeed within sixty (60) days after the expiration of the Claims Consultation Period, or is deemed unlikely to succeed by either Party at any time following thirty (30) days after the expiration of the Claims Consultation Period, the claim shall proceed to mediation. Amtrak shall pay all reasonable fees and costs of the mediator, which shall be ADR Associates or, in the event of unavailability, a mutually selected substitute. Each side shall pay its own fees and costs, with the fees and costs of Class Counsel paid from the Monitoring Fund.

3. Arbitration

If one of the Parties determines after one or more mediation sessions that the mediation is unlikely to be fruitful, or if the mediator concludes at any time that mediation is unlikely to be fruitful, the claim shall proceed to arbitration. Amtrak shall pay all reasonable fees and costs of the arbitrator, which shall be a principal of ADR Associates who did not conduct any of the mediation sessions, or in the event of unavailability, a mutually selected substitute. Each side shall pay its own fees and costs, with the fees and costs of Class Counsel paid from the Monitoring Fund.

(a) Hearings

An arbitration hearing on each such claim shall be set for an agreed date no later than one hundred eighty (180) days after the expiration of the Claims Consultation Period. The location of the hearing shall be by agreement of counsel. If no agreement is reached, location shall be determined by the arbitrator on consideration of location of documents, witnesses, and other factors concerning relative convenience to the Parties. Each side shall be entitled to present testimony and other evidence and argument for a maximum of four (4) hours per side. The arbitrator may grant additional time at his or her discretion, particularly when a Party's time has been consumed inordinately by objections, legal argument or uncooperative adverse witnesses. Following the hearing, the arbitrator shall render a written decision stating the result reached. Copies of the decision shall be sent to the Parties.

(b) Evidence

The Federal Rules of Evidence shall control in determining admissibility of evidence, except as set forth below. Requirements for establishing foundation and authenticity of documentary evidence, and hearsay objections to documentary evidence (although not double hearsay objections), are waived, although such considerations may be considered by the arbitrator in determining the weight of the evidence. Written and notarized statements from persons who are not currently Amtrak employees, and prior deposition testimony from persons who are not currently Amtrak employees, may be admitted into evidence for any purpose at the discretion of the arbitrator and giving weight to the fact that the individual is not available for cross-48 examination. Oral testimony shall be under oath. The arbitrator may request either Party to submit additional written or documentary information that the arbitrator considers necessary to reach a correct result. The arbitrator shall determine whether to request written briefs or memoranda prior to the hearing, following the hearing, and/or with respect to any issues raised during the hearing.

(c) Pre-hearing production of evidence

At least sixty (60) days before the arbitration, Class Counsel shall describe the specific Job Relief to be arbitrated and provide a written summary to Amtrak's counsel of why they contend the request meets the standards for favorable decision set forth in subsection (d) below. There shall be no depositions taken in connection with these arbitration proceedings. However, no later than thirty (30) days before the hearing, the Parties may by letter request from each other the production of specific, clearly defined relevant documents or information. Responsive documents or information shall be supplied within fifteen (15) days. At least ten (10) days prior to the hearing, counsel shall exchange the documents that they plan to use as exhibits at the hearing. No document may be used in any fashion in the arbitration if it has not been supplied to the other Party. No witness may be called at the hearing unless his/her name has been supplied to the other Party at least five (5) working days prior to the hearing. If a witness is currently an Amtrak employee, Amtrak shall make him or her available to testify at the hearing at no cost to the Job Relief Claimant. In the event the Parties are unable to resolve any disputes about the production of documents or information, they shall jointly confer with the arbitrator by telephone or in person to seek a resolution. In resolving any such disputes, the arbitrator's determination shall be guided by the principle of providing both Parties with a fair opportunity to present their respective positions and to respond to the other's presentation.

(d) Standards for decisions

If the Job Relief Claimant proves by a preponderance of the evidence that the Job Relief requested is necessary to make him or her whole from conduct that was the result of race discrimination, such Claimant shall be entitled to an award of Job Relief. The arbitrator may seek additional information from the Parties about the nature of adequate or available Job Relief.

C. DEFINITION OF JOB RELIEF

"Job Relief," as that term is used herein, includes a prospective remedial change in a person's job title, including a promotion, transfer, hiring or reinstatement. Job Relief may not include any request for monetary relief, including front or back pay, but may include a prospective change in pay rate. Unless the arbitrator decides otherwise, a successful Job Relief Claimant shall be entitled to the rate associated with the new position as of the date of the ruling establishing his or her right to relief, even if he or she is not placed into the new position until some time in the future, for example, until the position becomes vacant

VII. NOTICE

Prior to final approval of this Decree, and pursuant to Court Order, Class Counsel has provided mailed and published notice of the Settlement, the fairness hearing, and other matters. The costs of Published Notice shall be borne by Amtrak. The cost of postage for and distribution of Mailed Notice and the Forms shall be borne by the Settlement Fund, though Amtrak shall bear all costs relating to preparation of address lists.

VIII. RECORDKEEPING AND REPORTS

A. PERIODIC REPORTS

Amtrak shall provide semiannual reports, unless another period is specified below, to Class Counsel on each of the following subjects (to the extent they occurred during the period in question). The semiannual reports shall cover a six-month period (January 1 - June 30 and July 1 - December 31). Reports shall be provided within one month of the close of the period covered. The subjects to be covered are as follows:

1. Counts of the number of employees in Management positions for the company as a whole, for headquarters and each SBU, and for each compensation group (currently defined in terms of "bands" and "zones"), with subcounts for African Americans;

2. Counts of the number of new hires, transfers or promotions into Management positions for the company as a whole, for headquarters and each SBU, and for each compensation group, with subcounts for each racial group and for whether the new Management employees were Internal or External Applicants;

3. The results of the statistical analyses of interviews and placements required under section IV.B.3;

4. The average salary of employees in Management positions for the company as a whole, for headquarters and each SBU, and for each compensation group, with subcounts for African Americans;

5. The number of management positions and the number of positions for which job descriptions were prepared during the previous six months and since the Injunctive Effective Date, pursuant to the obligations under section IV.E;

6. The results of the analyses of performance appraisal overall ratings, which shall be provided annually for the previous calendar year, as provided in section IV.F.3;

7. Computerized or written records of the number of persons consulting the career counselor and, to the extent known, the number of African Americans in that group, as provided in section IV.G.2;

8. The results of the analysis of training data, which shall be provided annually for the previous calendar year, as provided in section IV.G.3;

9. Computerized or written records of race discrimination complaints by African Americans to the EEO Resolution Unit, as provided in section IV.I.2, including but not limited to the date of the complaint, the person allegedly engaging in the discriminatory activity, the EEO manager to whom the complaint was referred, whether the complaint was resolved through the early resolution process, the date of such early resolution, whether there were any recommendations for sanctions or discipline as a result, and the date of such recommendations and report;

10. Computerized or written records of all investigations of patterns and practices of racially discriminatory conduct against African Americans by individuals or departments, including the date any such investigation was launched, the name of the person or department investigated, the person performing the investigation, whether the investigation resulted in any recommendations for sanctions or discipline, and the date of such recommendation; and

11. A log of all training courses given to EEO Resolution Unit investigators or Management employees that have as a subject EEO issues, including all persons in attendance, as provided in section IV.I.3.

B. COPIES OF CERTAIN ITEMS TO BE PROVIDED

Amtrak will provide Class Counsel with copies of the following items required by or related to the Consent Decree, at least two weeks prior to their implementation unless otherwise indicated; provided, however, that except with respect to item 16, the provision of such items prior to their implementation does not give Class Counsel any power to do more than make recommendations to Amtrak, unless otherwise provided elsewhere in this Decree:

1. The application form to be developed for External Applicants for Management positions pursuant to section IV.B.1 and any revisions to such form or to Amtrak's Job Opportunity Application Form;

2. The standardized interview procedures to be developed pursuant to section IV.B.2 and any revisions to such procedures;

3. The standardized interview assessment form or forms to be developed pursuant to section IV.B.2 and any revisions to such forms;

4. Any RIF analysis and justification for any racially disparate impact as provided in section IV.C, in the time frames required by that section;

5. Any analysis of the placement rates of employees whose jobs were eliminated by a RIF as provided in section IV.C, to be provided within seven days after its completion;

6. A preliminary report as part of the compensation study as provided in section IV.D.1 that identifies the proposed means for taking into account factors such as experience, abilities, performance appraisals, and geographic location, to be provided within seven days after its delivery to Amtrak;

7. The final report and recommendations of the compensation study as provided in section IV.D.1, to be provided within seven days after its delivery to Amtrak;

8. A list of all employees whose compensation will be increased as a result of the compensation study, as provided in section IV.D.2;

9. The revised performance appraisal system, as provided in section IV.F.2;

10. Any recommendations to reduce any observed disparities in performance appraisal ratings as provided in section IV.F.3, to be provided within seven days after the completion of the report containing such recommendations;

11. The authorization form for training requests, as provided in section IV.G.1;

12. Any recommendations to reduce any observed disparities in training, as provided in section IV.G.3 to be provided within seven days after the completion of the report containing such recommendations;

13. Procedures for the Appeal Board, as provided in section IV.H.1 and 2;

14. Any recommendations of the VP Business Diversity with respect to EEO and diversity issues that have been approved by the President of Amtrak as provided in section IV.I.1, within seven days after such approval;

15. Protocols for referral of employee relations complaints to the EEO Office and for the communication of information between the EEO Resolution Unit and the Law Department as provided in section IV.I.1;

16. The policy statement of rights of employees to be distributed annually to employees as provided in section IV.I.1;

17. The procedures for filing internal EEO complaints as provided in section IV.I.1;

18. The form on which complainants may indicate their level of satisfaction with the EEO Office's performance and any revisions thereto, as provided in section IV.I.2; and 19. Any audit conducted by the EEO Office of a department or organizational unit as provided in section IV. I.2, to be provided within seven days after the completion of the audit.

C. ACCESS TO RECORDS

Amtrak will provide Class Counsel access for sufficient time to inspect the following records on twenty days written notice to Amtrak's counsel; provided, however, that Amtrak may require Class Counsel to specify the particular positions or persons for which Class Counsel seeks information if the documents responsive to any request are sufficiently voluminous to make the provision of access unduly burdensome.

1. Completed applications of Internal and External Applicants for positions, as provided in section IV.B.1;

2. Completed interview assessment forms of candidates, as provided in section IV.B.2;

3. The written criteria for deciding which qualified Internal Applicants to interview and the rationale for selecting them, as provided in section IV.B.2;

4. Non-privileged documentation relating to Amtrak's final selection of positions to be eliminated in a RIF, as provided in section IV.C;

5. Revised job specifications and descriptions, as provided in section IV.E.1;

6. Postings, as provided in section IV.E.2;

7. All written appeals of job descriptions and the records relating to the review and disposition of such appeals, as provided in section IV.E.3;

8. Performance appraisals of employees, as provided in section IV.F.2;

9. Annual printouts of training requests and training provided, as provided in section IV.G.1;

10. The booklet describing training courses, and any revisions thereof, as provided in section IV.G.1;

11. The written or on-line log of training courses, as provided in section IV.G.1;

12. The proceedings and records of the Appeal Board, as provided in section IV.H.3;

13. EEO Resolution Unit records for any complaint, under the conditions set forth in section IV.I.2;

14. The evaluation forms filled out by complainants indicating their level of satisfaction with the processes and performance of the EEO Office, as provided in section IV.I.2; and

15. The materials used in all training courses given to EEO Resolution Unit investigators or Management employees that have as a subject EEO issues, as provided in section IV.I.3.

D. REPORTS TO THE COURT

Class Counsel shall file a written report with the Court every six months concerning the implementation of the provisions of the Decree, and shall serve a copy of such report on counsel for Amtrak. If requested by the Court, Class Counsel and Amtrak's Counsel shall appear before the Court to provide any additional information requested by the Court.

IX. MONITORING

A. Monitor Roles

Amtrak's internal monitor shall be the VP Business Diversity. The VP Business Diversity may delegate monitoring tasks to the Director, Diversity Monitoring (or an outside consultant as described in Section IV(I)(1) of the Decree) and the Senior Director, EEO Resolution.

B. Periodic Meetings

Class Counsel and the VP Business Diversity will meet every 90 days during the period of this Decree to discuss and resolve any outstanding issues with respect to implementation of and compliance with this Decree. Any issues that may arise during the term of the Decree with respect to individual Class Members shall be handled according to the applicable procedures and processes included in the injunctive provisions of this Decree; however nothing in the foregoing shall prohibit Class Counsel and the VP Business Diversity from resolving such matters informally if they are willing and so able. One Class Representative who is an employee is entitled to attend each meeting, but may be recused for employee-specific discussions. Any information obtained by Class Counsel or the participating Class Representative during these meetings shall be treated as confidential and shall not be used for any purpose except for enforcement of this Decree. Amtrak shall not be required to pay transportation or lodging expenses for the Class Representative, though it may elect to do so.

X. ENFORCEMENT

A. Negotiation and Mediation

Prior to instituting any proceedings to enforce the provisions of this Decree, with the exception of proceedings relating to Sections IV(A)(1) and IV(A)(3) above, Class Counsel shall provide written notice to the VP Business Diversity, with a copy to Amtrak's counsel, that specifically sets forth the ways in which Class Counsel believes that Amtrak is in violation of the Decree and the evidence in support thereof. If such notice is provided at least 10-30 days prior to a meeting scheduled pursuant to Section X(B) above, the issues that are set forth in the notice shall be placed on the agenda for discussion during that meeting. If notice is provided more than 30 days prior, then the Parties shall hold a meeting within 20 days. If such notice is provided within 10 days prior to a meeting scheduled pursuant to Section X(B) above, then at Amtrak's election, the issues that are set forth in the notice may be placed on the agenda for discussion at the regularly scheduled meeting or at a meeting to be held within 20 days of such notice.

The Parties will in good faith attempt to resolve all enforcement issues through discussion and negotiations. If the Parties are unable to resolve an issue raised in a written notice through discussion and negotiations, then Amtrak will provide a formal written response to Class Counsel within 15 days of the periodic meeting at which the issue will be discussed. The Parties will submit any unresolved enforcement issues to mediation within 30 days of the date that a discussion is held on the issue. Mediation will be discontinued if the issue is not resolved within 30 days of submission of the issue to mediation.

B. Procedures for Enforcement Proceedings

Enforcement proceedings, if any, shall be brought on written motion to the Court. If such proceedings are brought, Amtrak shall have 20 working days to file its response, unless such period is shortened by Court order.

XI. CONFIDENTIALITY AND RETURN OF DOCUMENTS

Class counsel acknowledge that during the course of this litigation they have received, and may hereafter receive under this Decree in connection with the monitoring, confidential information regarding Amtrak and its personnel, including without limitation, personnel files, internal memoranda, personnel plans, programs, policies and procedures, computerized data and other information. Amtrak's counsel acknowledges that they have received confidential information regarding the Named Plaintiffs. The Parties, their retained experts, their consultants and their attorneys shall continue to be bound by the terms of the Stipulated Protective Order filed December 28, 1998, throughout the term of this Decree and thereafter. Plaintiffs, Class Counsel, and their experts and consultants and others retained by them hereby agree not to disclose any confidential information that may be received from Amtrak during the term of the Decree. Class Counsel shall be responsible for advising their experts, outside consultants, and any other individual acting for or on behalf of Class Counsel, of the confidentiality provisions of this Decree and shall require that each such individual sign a confidentiality agreement in a form similar to the form that was used in connection with the Mediation in this case.

Each Party shall, within sixty (60) days after the Injunctive Effective Date of this Decree, make available to the other Party all documents (and copies of documents) that were produced by the other Party in the course of the litigation, including all copies thereof that have been provided to or are in the possession of the Party's expert(s) or consultant(s). However, Class Counsel may retain in their possession their merged copy of Amtrak's HRIS/EIS computer disks for purposes of claims administration, Job Relief actions and allocation of the Settlement Fund. Class Counsel may also retain such documents as they reasonably deem appropriate for use in connection with the individual Plaintiffs' Job Relief actions. Plaintiffs shall provide an inventory of documents retained to Amtrak's counsel. The HRIS/EIS disks and documents that may be retained under this Section shall be made available for return to Amtrak no later than thirty (30) days after the conclusion of the Job Relief and claims-administration procedures set forth herein.

XII. PUBLICITY

In addition to the promises of confidentiality expressly set forth in Section XII, the Parties agree that they shall negotiate and issue Joint Press Releases consistent with the Press Release in connection with the Agreement in Principle, which shall be made available to the news media following the Court's preliminary and final approval of this Decree, subject to any necessary revision agreed on after final approval to reflect final approval dates, proceedings, and provisions. No counsel shall make any written or oral statements at any time that are inaccurate and/or inconsistent with the Joint Press Release (and any revision thereto on final approval) and with the joint press release that was made available to the news media in connection with the Parties' June 24, 1999 Agreement in Principle, nor shall Class Counsel advise or in any manner promote a Plaintiff or Class Member to make an inconsistent statement.

XIII. SEVERABILITY

Except as set forth below, if any term or provision of this Decree, or the application thereof to any person or circumstances, is held to any extent to be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Decree, or the application of such term or provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is held to be invalid or unenforceable, shall not be affected thereby, and each term and provision of this Decree shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law. Notwithstanding the above, if all of the injunctive provisions in section IV, the entire monetary Claims Process, or the entire Job Relief Process is held to be invalid or unenforceable, the entire Decree shall be null and void.

XIII. GOVERNING LAW/ENTIRE AGREEMENT

The Parties agree that the validity, construction and enforcement of this Decree shall be governed by federal law. To the extent that it is determined that the validity, construction or enforcement of this Decree or any release executed pursuant to its terms is governed by state law, the law of the District of Columbia shall apply.

This Decree, including the Exhibits hereto, contains the entire agreement and understanding of the Parties with respect to the settlement of this litigation. This Decree does not impose any obligations on the Parties beyond the terms and conditions stated herein. Accordingly, this Decree shall not prevent or preclude Amtrak from revising its employment practices and policies or taking other personnel actions during the term of the Decree that do not violate specific requirements of the Decree.

Except as specifically provided for in this Decree, this Decree may not be amended or modified except with the express written consent of the Parties and the approval of the Court.

All Parties to this Decree acknowledge that this Decree is final and binding in all respects.

Date: August 24, 1999

AMENDED EXHIBIT 2

PUBLISHED NOTICE

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

AMTRAK DISCRIMINATION LITIGATION

FROM: EMMET G. SULLIVAN JUDGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WASHINGTON, D.C.

TO: ALL McLAURIN PLAINTIFFS AND CURRENT AND FORMER EMPLOYEES OF AMTRAK WHO WORKED IN POSITIONS NOT COVERED BY A COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT ("MANAGEMENT POSITIONS"), OR ALL BLACK PERSONS WHO APPLIED FOR SUCH POSITIONS AND WERE NOT HIRED, AT ANY TIME BETWEEN JANUARY 1, 1995 AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1999.

This Court wishes to advise you that a settlement has been reached between Amtrak and plaintiffs in a race discrimination class action commenced in 1998. Following more than six months of Court-ordered mediation, the parties advised the Court of their proposed overall settlement of the entire litigation, notwithstanding Amtrak's denial of any liability.

Under the settlement, Amtrak will pay Eight Million Dollars ($8,000,000) in cash into a settlement fund over approximately a thirteen-month period, with the first deposit of Four Million Dollars ($4,000,000) being made on or before October 15, 1999, and the second deposit of Four Million Dollars ($4,000,000) plus six percent interest compounded monthly from October 15, 1999 through the date of payment, being made on or before November 15, 2000. These payments will cover the claims of all class members and plaintiffs, and the attorneys' and experts' fees, as well as other expenses. Amtrak also has agreed to revise many of its employment practices. Amtrak's compliance with the settlement will be monitored by counsel for the plaintiffs and class members and the Court over the next four years. The settlement does not provide for quotas based on race or for the displacement of anyone from a job.

The Court has reviewed and granted preliminary approval of the overall settlement, in the form of a Consent Decree, and will reach a final decision as to its fairness and adequacy after the class members and any other employees who might be affected have had an opportunity to comment, if they wish, favorably or otherwise, on the agreement.

You may be a member of the class if you fit the description above. Class members who file claims with respect to hiring, advancement, promotion, suspension/ termination, or other Amtrak employment decisions or actions that arose during the time period defined above, may receive cash awards under the Consent Decree. Certain class members may also be eligible to receive job relief, such as a promotion or transfer, if agreed to by Amtrak or ordered by an arbitrator. This settlement would provide the sole procedure for both plaintiffs and class members to obtain relief for all claims that arose during the time period defined above. Any race discrimination claim, or claim based on events that could have given rise to a race discrimination claim, of class members who do not file claims under this procedure and who do not exclude themselves from the terms of this settlement would be barred.

TO BE CONSIDERED FOR CASH AWARDS AND/OR JOB RELIEF UNDER THE SETTLEMENT, YOU MUST OBTAIN AND FILE A CLAIM FORM AND/OR JOB RELIEF ELECTION FORM. THESE FORMS CAN BE OBTAINED BY WRITING OR CALLING THE AGENT FOR CLASS COUNSEL AT THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS/PHONE NUMBER: AMTRAK EMPLOYMENT LITIGATION, P.O. BOX 4390, PORTLAND, OR 97208-4390, (800) 625-5506. Forms may also be downloaded from the web: http://www.amtraksettlement.com/ or at http://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/. FOR CLAIM FORMS TO BE CONSIDERED, THEY MUST BE MAILED TO THE FOREGOING OREGON ADDRESS AND POSTMARKED NO LATER THAN OCTOBER 29, 1999. FOR JOB RELIEF ELECTION FORMS TO BE CONSIDERED, THEY MUST BE MAILED TO SPRENGER & LANG, PLLC, 1614 - 20 TH STREET, N.W., WASHINGTON, DC 20009-1001, AND POSTMARKED NO LATER THAN OCTOBER 29, 1999. CLAIM FORMS AND JOB RELIEF ELECTION FORMS FILED BY CLASS MEMBERS AFTER THAT DATE WILL NOT BE ALLOWED, SUBJECT TO APPLICABLE LAW.

You may obtain a longer notice of the Consent Decree terms without cost from the Agent for Class Counsel. This notice summarizes the general criteria for the awards that will be made and provides more detail of the other benefits and changes in Amtrak's employment practices required under the Consent Decree. You may also obtain a copy of the full Consent Decree by paying $12.00 by check or money order to Class Counsel to cover copying and mailing costs. To obtain either of these documents, write or phone the Agent for Class Counsel at the above Oregon address or "800" phone number, making sure to specify what you wish to obtain. Alternatively, you may view the Consent Decree without cost on web at http://www.amtraksettlement.com/ or http://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/, or in person at the Office of the Clerk, United States District Court, 333 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC, 20001.

This Court will hold a hearing at 9:00 a.m. on October 25, 1999, at the United States District Courthouse for the District of Columbia, Courtroom 11. At that time, the Court will hear comments, favorable or otherwise, concerning the settlement pursuant to the procedure described below.

CLASS MEMBERS NEED NOT BE PRESENT IN COURT TO FILE A CLAIM FORM OR JOB RELIEF FORM OR RECEIVE A CASH AWARD OR OTHER BENEFIT FROM THE SETTLEMENT. CLASS MEMBERS WILL BE REPRESENTED IN COURT BY SPRENGER & LANG AND THE WASHINGTON LAWYERS' COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS AND URBAN AFFAIRS AT NO COST TO THEM.

If you are a class member but do not wish to benefit from the settlement, you may exclude yourself from its terms. However, to do so, you must send a written statement excluding yourself, postmarked no later than October 6, 1999, to the Clerk of Court, P.O. Box 19500, Washington, DC 20036.

If you are a person to whom this Notice is directed and you want to object to or otherwise comment on the settlement, you must send a written statement objecting to or commenting on the settlement, postmarked no later than October 6, 1999, to the Clerk of Court, P.O. Box 19500, Washington, DC 20036. If you wish to be heard at the hearing, you must so indicate in your written objection or comment. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, you may then appear at the hearing yourself, or with an attorney of your own choice, at your own expense. However, unless you have excluded yourself from the settlement, you will be bound by the judgment of the Court, whether or not it is favorable.

THE COURT CANNOT PROVIDE YOU WITH LEGAL ADVICE. ALL INQUIRIES TO THE COURT ABOUT THE SETTLEMENT WILL BE REFERRED TO SPRENGER & LANG AS LEAD COUNSEL. You may direct any comment or inquiry to Class Counsel by mail at Sprenger & Lang, 1614 20th Street N.W., Washington, DC 20009 at any time. The Washington Lawyers' Committee also represented plaintiffs in this litigation.

September 22, 1999

Emmet G. Sullivan Judge, United States District Court for the District of Columbia

AMENDED EXHIBIT 1

MAILED NOTICE

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT AMTRAK EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION LITIGATION

FROM: EMMET G. SULLIVAN JUDGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WASHINGTON, D.C.

TO: ALL PLAINTIFFS AND CURRENT AND FORMER BLACK EMPLOYEES OF AMTRAK WHO WORKED IN POSITIONS NOT COVERED BY A COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT ("MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES") AT ANY TIME BETWEEN JANUARY 1, 1995 AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1999.

This Court wishes to inform you that a settlement, in the form of a Consent Decree, has been reached by Plaintiffs and Defendant Amtrak, in a lawsuit alleging race discrimination in employment. If approved by the Court, this will be a complete settlement of the case and will provide various kinds of relief, including monetary relief, for those eligible members of the class who file timely claims.

The Court has reviewed the settlement and has given it preliminary approval. Before deciding whether to finally approve the settlement, the Court wishes to inform you of the general terms of the proposed Decree and of your right to comment on the settlement, if you so desire. If the settlement is finally approved by the Court and becomes effective after a hearing regarding the fairness of the settlement ("the fairness hearing"), the Court's judgment will be final and binding.

This Notice is only a summary of the settlement. The Consent Decree which includes the entire settlement is available for review on the web at http://www.amtraksettlement.com/, http://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/, or in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court, 333 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. Other orders that the Court may issue from time to time regarding the administration of the Decree will also be on file with the Court. You alternatively may obtain a copy of the Consent Decree by paying Twelve Dollars ($12) by check or money order to cover copying and mailing expenses, to the Agent for Class Counsel at: Amtrak Employment Litigation, P.O. Box 4390, Portland, OR 97208-4390, 1-800-625-5506.

The Court will decide whether to give final approval to this Consent Decree after the fairness hearing to be held at 9:00 a.m. on October 25, 1999, in Courtroom Number 11 at the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, 333 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. You are not required to appear at the hearing. If you are a class member and do not appear, you will be represented by attorneys for the class at no cost to you. You may, if you wish, appear and comment on or object to the settlement to the extent it might affect you. You may also hire an attorney of your own choice, if you wish, at your own expense. If you plan to comment on or object to the manner in which the Consent Decree might affect you, you must file a written notice of appearance identifying yourself and any attorney you may retain and state specifically why you want to object to the Consent Decree. This statement must be mailed to the Court at the following address: Clerk of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, P.O. Box 19500, Washington, D.C. 20036. It must be postmarked on or before October 6, 1999 to be considered. You need not appear at the hearing for your comments or objection to be considered by the Court. However, you may appear only if you first file the notice and statement described above to advise the Court of your intention to appear.

SUMMARY OF DECREE

1. In August 1998, plaintiffs filed a class action lawsuit alleging that Amtrak had illegally discriminated against African Americans employees who either were or had been employed in positions not covered by a collective bargaining agreement ("management positions"), or who had applied for such positions and not been selected. Amtrak has denied all allegations and does not admit to any wrongdoing.

Following an intensive period of Court-ordered mediation, counsel for Amtrak and Class Counsel advised the Court that they had agreed in principle that the case should be settled without the uncertainty, delay, and expense of continued litigation.

2. You are a member of the class affected by the settlement agreement (the "class") if you are a plaintiff or black person who, at any time between January 1, 1995 and September 30, 1999:

a) has been employed by Amtrak in positions, other than positions on Amtrak's Management Committee, not subject to a collective bargaining agreement ("CBA") ("management positions"); and/or,

b) has applied and been rejected by Amtrak for management positions, including applicants who were not then Amtrak employees and those who were then employed by Amtrak in positions subject to a CBA ("non-management positions").

Even if you come within these definitions, however, you will not be able to recover any money under the Decree for any claim(s) as to which you knowingly executed a valid release or as to which there has previously been a final judicial determination. If you do not timely file a Claim Form and/or a Job Relief Form as explained below, you will also be barred in the future from making any such claims.

3. The agreement settles claims of discrimination against Amtrak, which were made or could have been made, by members of the class based on their employment or application for employment with Amtrak in a management position during the relevant time period.

If you have such a claim, the agreement provides your only procedure for asserting it unless you affirmatively "opt out" as provided in the Hearing section (page 10). Otherwise such claims are barred. Moreover, all plaintiffs and class members who accept a monetary award under the Decree will be barred from asserting any employment claim against Amtrak for actions or omissions relating to their employment in management positions or application for management positions through September 30, 1999, except for claims under the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act or the Railroad Retirement Tax Act.

The agreement does not settle claims of discrimination which have been made or could be made by class members based on their employment in non-management positions. For example, members of the Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees who applied for management positions but were discriminatorily denied such jobs, and who filed a monetary claim under this settlement, would not be precluded from receiving monetary awards from any future settlement of the class action charging Amtrak with employing discriminatory practices in BMWE positions in its Engineering Department in the Northeast Corridor.

4. Under the settlement, Amtrak will pay Eight Million Dollars ($8,000,000) plus interest into a Settlement Fund. It shall make two deposits. On or before October 15, 1999, Amtrak shall deposit Four Million Dollars ($4,000,000) into the Settlement Fund. Amtrak shall deposit an additional Four Million Dollars ($4,000,000) plus six percent interest compounded monthly during the intervening year, on or before November 15, 2000.

The Settlement Fund shall be administered by Class Counsel under the Court's supervision. The Fund will be divided into two portions. The first portion shall consist of five million dollars ($5,000,000) in the aggregate, together with interest and income earned on this amount. The Claims Portion shall be used to pay the plaintiffs and class members to compromise their individual employment claims and to maintain reserves for taxes. The remaining amount of the Fund will be used to pay counsel for the plaintiffs and the class for their attorneys' fees, experts' fees, mediation fees, and other expenses, as well as the future costs of administering the Settlement Fund and monitoring Amtrak's compliance with the terms of the settlement.

5. IF YOU ARE A PLAINTIFF OR CLASS MEMBER AND WISH TO FILE A CLAIM, YOU MUST COMPLETE AND SUBMIT A CLAIM FORM IN AN ENVELOPE POSTMARKED ON OR BEFORE OCTOBER 29, 1999. A COPY OF A CLAIM FORM AND INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING IT ARE ENCLOSED. AFTER YOU FILE A TIMELY CLAIM FORM, YOU NEED DO NOTHING FURTHER UNTIL YOU ARE CONTACTED BY CLASS COUNSEL.

6. Class members, including plaintiffs, who timely file claim forms will have their claims reviewed for validity by Class Counsel applying the criteria for eligibility set out in the Consent Decree as part of the claims administration process. Claims will then be allocated points for responses to questions on the Claim Form based on uniform standards. The information will be verified for accuracy against Amtrak's employment data. Untruthful responses will disqualify a claimant.

The precise formula by which the claims portion of the settlement fund will be allocated among claimants has not yet been determined and must be approved by the Court. It is anticipated, however, that the formula will include points for the following and possibly other factors: (1) length of employment with Amtrak; (2) strength of claim and amount of damages from alleged denial of advancement opportunities (claims based on initial assignment, promotion, and transfer decisions); (3) strength of claim and amount of damages from alleged compensation discrimination (claims based on disparities in pay); (4) strength of claim and amount of damages from discipline imposed (claims based on suspension or termination decisions); (5) strength of claim and amount of damages from alleged racial conduct or language; and (6) contributions to the prosecution of the litigation. Claims involving alleged unfair performance appraisals, inadequate training, or disciplinary action resulting in less than suspension or termination, will be treated as claims attributable to any resulting personnel actions such as lost promotions. Points will be awarded to unsuccessful applicants for management positions based on such factors as: (1) pay grade of job sought; (3) demonstrated suitability and/or qualification for the job sought; (4) strength of claim; and, (5) contribution to the prosecution of the litigation. The precise formula for allocating the fund to class members, as well as the final proposed distributions, will be submitted under seal to the Court for approval.

Monetary awards to class members will be made by the Court based on analyses made by Class Counsel after reviewing the claim forms and applying the formula. Claimant awards will reflect their total assigned points in proportion to total points of all claimants combined. At this time, it is not possible to predict how much money a particular claimant will receive, if any. Submission of a claim form does not automatically entitle you to an award or to points earned toward a monetary award.

All claimants obtaining monetary awards will be required to sign releases, in language agreed on by Class Counsel and Amtrak, of all employment-related claims concerning their employment in or application for management positions, and of claims against the Settlement Fund. Class Counsel will be required to withhold from each award and deposit with the government employment and income taxes.

7. At its own expense, and apart from the Settlement Fund, Amtrak has agreed to make revisions to its employment practices in the areas of (but not limited to) hiring, advancement/promotion, training, pay, job descriptions, performance appraisals, RIF's, disciplinary processes, and equal employment opportunity processes. The settlement does not provide for any quotas based on race. Nor does it provide for displacing anyone from a job.

The various prospective internal revisions in employment practices that Amtrak has agreed to implement are intended to enhance opportunities for employment and advancement of all Amtrak employees and applicants, without regard to race, and to provide for a workplace that promotes fairness for all employees.

Accordingly, Amtrak will: (1) revise its performance appraisal system; (2) revise selection and interview procedures; (3) revise its disciplinary procedures; (4) revise its cultural diversity training programs; (5) adopt uniform and objective procedures for selecting employees; (6) revise posting procedures for jobs; (7) undertake a comprehensive compensation study to determine if adjustments are warranted for certain individuals; (8) review all position descriptions to determine if they accurately reflect the duties of any given job; (9) provide career development counseling for employees interested in management positions; (10) dramatically improve databases, including applicant flow, discipline and equal employment opportunity data; (11) include an equal employment opportunity component to performance appraisals and preclude Management employees who are rated unsatisfactory in the component from being promoted for one (1) year; (12) create a new and independent office to staff internal equal employment opportunity investigations and conciliation, which shall report to the newlycreated office of Vice President Business Diversity; (13) create the position of Vice President of Business Diversity, who shall, as an officer of the Corporation, report directly to the President of Amtrak and shall have the authority and obligation to implement new equal employment opportunity and diversity measures and/or disciplinary actions up to and including termination on approval of the President; (14) revamp its internal equal employment opportunity complaint and investigation procedures; (15) introduce new "early resolution" procedures to address discrimination complaints in the workplace; and (16) clarify that discrimination and failure to discipline discriminators are offenses susceptible to termination. Amtrak's compliance with its commitments will be monitored by the Court through reports to be supplied to Class Counsel by Amtrak, and quarterly meetings held between Amtrak and Class Counsel. Class Counsel thereafter will file periodic summaries of such reports with the Court.

8. Under the Decree, certain class members are eligible to participate in a process designed to provide them with job relief, such as a promotion or reinstatement. Class members who applied and were rejected by Amtrak for management positions at a time that they were not Amtrak employees are ineligible for job relief. The job relief process will include direct negotiation, followed by mediated negotiation if direct negotiation is unsuccessful, followed by a hearing before an arbitrator if mediated negotiation is unsuccessful. The arbitrator may order such job relief upon individual proof of demonstrable incidents of discrimination. However, no such relief will displace any incumbent employee from his or her current position, and ordinarily it will be tied to a future vacancy. Class members who participate in this job relief process, however, will be accorded a use tax equal to twenty-five percent (25%) of the total points and all points related to such specific claim allocated to them under the Court-approved formula and pursuant to the Claim Form.

IF YOU ARE A PLAINTIFF OR CLASS MEMBER AND WISH TO SEEK JOB RELIEF, YOU MUST COMPLETE AND SUBMIT A JOB RELIEF FORM IN AN ENVELOPE POSTMARKED ON OR BEFORE OCTOBER 29, 1999. A COPY OF A JOB RELIEF ELECTION FORM AND INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING IT ARE ENCLOSED. AFTER YOU FILE A TIMELY JOB RELIEF ELECTION FORM, YOU NEED DO NOTHING FURTHER UNTIL YOU ARE CONTACTED BY CLASS COUNSEL.

9. Amtrak's payment into the Settlement Fund will also cover costs, fees and expenses incurred by plaintiffs and the class in the litigation from its inception to date, and to pay for the administration and distribution of the Settlement Fund, the handling of the job relief process, and the monitoring of Amtrak's compliance with the Consent Decree over its four-year term. These litigation, administration, and monitoring costs will be paid by Amtrak over and above the $5,000,000 paid by Amtrak to resolve the claims of plaintiffs and class members. Thus, if you are a class member and receive an award from the Fund, you will not owe any fees or expenses to the lawyers who have represented you as part of the class.

HEARING

If you have an objection to the settlement and do not file it with the Court, the Court will not consider it in determining the fairness of the settlement. Any attorney who will appear at the hearing on October 25, 1999 on your behalf must identify him/herself in writing to the Court no later than the last day for filing written objections, October 6, 1999. If you do not wish to object to or comment on the terms of the settlement, it is not necessary to attend the fairness hearing or do anything else.

If you are a class member and wish to pursue your own lawsuit against Amtrak arising out of acts of discrimination that occurred before the settlement of this lawsuit, you may notify the Court in writing that you request not to benefit from this settlement and not to proceed with a monetary or job relief claim under the terms of the Consent Decree. To be effective, any such "opt out" notice must be mailed to the Clerk of the Court at P.O. Box 19500, Washington, DC 20036 and postmarked no later than October 6, 1999. If you do not "opt out" from the settlement in this way, you will be bound by its terms and will not be able to pursue any separate discrimination charge or lawsuit for acts occurring before September 30, 1999. Participation in the lawsuit will not bar you from pursuing claims of discrimination that occur on or after September 30, 1999.

Class members may obtain a written response to their written questions about the settlement from Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel by addressing your inquiries to Michael Lieder and Maia Caplan, Sprenger & Lang, 1614 20th Street N.W., Washington, D.C. 20009. The Washington Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights & Urban Affairs also represented plaintiffs and the class members in this action.

The judgment of the Court will be final as to the fairness and adequacy of this settlement. Its judgment will determine the rights of class members who do not opt out of the settlement and any other affected persons or entities with respect to the matters covered by the agreement, and you will be bound by the judgment whether favorable or not.

September 22, 1999

Emmet G. Sullivan Judge, United States District Court for the District of Columbia

EXHIBIT 5

AMTRAK SETTLEMENT FUND

INSTRUCTIONS TO FILE A CLAIM OR JOB RELIEF ELECTION FORM YOU MAY HAVE A CLAIM FOR MONETARY AND/OR JOB RELIEF IN CONNECTION WITH THE SETTLEMENT OF THE McLAURIN RACE DISCRIMINATION LAWSUIT AGAINST AMTRAK.

If you want to file a claim for a monetary award from the Amtrak Settlement Fund, you must complete and sign a Claim Form, along with any attachments required by that form, and mail it in the enclosed envelope by October 29, 1999. The form must be addressed to Class Counsel's agent at Amtrak Employment Litigation, P.O. Box 4390, Portland, OR 97208-4390.

If you want to obtain job relief, you must complete and sign a Job Relief Election Form and mail it in the enclosed envelope by October 29, 1999. The form must be addressed to Class Counsel Sprenger & Lang, PLLC, 1614 - 20 th Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20009. Read all instructions carefully before deciding whether to file a job relief claim. It will reduce the amount of money that you may receive from your Claim Form.

If you want to seek both types of relief, you must complete and sign both the Claim Form and the Job Relief Election Form and mail them in the enclosed envelopes by October 29, 1999.

No forms received in envelopes postmarked after October 29, 1999 will be considered. You are allowed to file only one Claim Form and/or one Job Relief Form even if you have claims relating to more than one personnel action. The Claim Form is designed so you can record all of your claims within the time period covered by the lawsuit.

This is the relevant time period for claims:

CLAIMS BY ALL McLAURIN PLAINTIFFS AND CURRENT AND FORMER BLACK EMPLOYEES OF AMTRAK WHO WORKED IN POSITIONS NOT COVERED BY A COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT ("MANAGEMENT POSITIONS"), OR ALL BLACK PERSONS WHO APPLIED FOR SUCH POSITIONS AND WERE NOT HIRED, AT ANY TIME BETWEEN JANUARY 1, 1995 AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1999.

Claims that arose before or after this period are NOT eligible for awards from the settlement fund or for job relief.

CLAIM FORM FOR MONETARY RELIEF:

Be sure to follow these instructions to find out if you may be eligible for an award of money:

1. Fill out the Claim Form completely and truthfully. The information you provide is confidential. It will be disclosed only to the lawyers for the class except as the Court may otherwise order. Failure to fill out either form truthfully will result in disqualification from participation in the settlement.

2. Put it into the appropriate pre-addressed envelope that comes with this letter.

3. Mail it by October 29, 1999. You must add postage.

4. You must inform Class Counsel's agent at, Amtrak Employment Litigation, P.O. Box 4390, Portland, OR 97208-4390, 1-800-625-5506, of any address change after you mail the Claim Form. Failure to do so within ninety (90) days of any change of address may result in disqualification of your claim and/or loss of all money which otherwise would have been awarded.

JOB RELIEF ELECTION FORM:

Be sure to follow these instructions to find out if you may be eligible to participate in the job relief process and to determine if you wish to participate given the costs to you of participating in it:

1. Limitations on Participation. You may participate in the Job Relief process only if your claim involves discrimination in hiring, promotion, demotion or termination and, entails a raise in annual compensation of at least five thousand dollars ($5,000). Applicants who were not Amtrak employees (management or union) are not eligible to participate in the job relief process and should not fill out this Form.

2. Costs to You of Participating in the Job Relief Process. If you choose to participate in the Job Relief Process, WHETHER OR NOT YOU SUCCEED IN PROCURING JOB RELIEF, YOUR MONETARY AWARD FROM THE CLAIM FUND WILL BE REDUCED. Do not fill out and submit the form if you do not wish to lose points associated with your claim for monetary relief.

If you elect to participate, you will automatically lose:

a. Twenty-five percent (25%) of your total points allocated to your claims for monetary relief under the formula used by the Court; and

b All (100%) of the points allocated to the claim for which Job Relief is sought.

Example. Assume hypothetically that you receive 100 total points under the Court's formula -- 25 for case participation, 25 for discriminatory rejection for promotion, 25 for hostile environment, and 25 for discriminatory discipline. If you elect to pursue Job Relief on the promotion claim, then you will lose 25 points (your entire allocation for the failure to promote) and 25% of your remaining 75 points, for a total of 43.75 points lost. Thus, instead of receiving a share of the Claims Fund proportionate to 100 points, your share will be proportionate to 56.25 points.

This means that your monetary award will be less than if you did not participate in the Job Relief process.

Why the Costs?

The settlement is structured this way for two reasons. First, if you are successful in gaining Job Relief, your economic damages will be less prospectively because you will have no loss of "front-pay." Thus, you should take proportionately less from the Settlement Fund. And second, the Job Relief process is extremely expensive because it entails a three-step effort to secure a change in job for you -negotiation, mediation, and arbitration (a mini-hearing). The majority of class members will prefer not to bear the costs associated with Job Relief, for themselves or others, relying instead on the systemic changes required by Amtrak under the Consent Decree to assist them with moving ahead in the future. (Amtrak has committed to undertake a management-wide compensation study and to correct within 2 ½ years any disparities in compensation attributable to racial discrimination (upon external evaluation.) This will happen separate and apart from the Job Relief Process.)

3. If you have questions about whether Job Relief is appropriate for you given these costs, please call Sprenger & Lang at 202-265-8010 or write to Sprenger & Lang at 1614 - 20 th Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20009-1001. One of the Class Counsel will respond as promptly as possible.

4. Fill out the Job Relief Election Form completely and truthfully. The information you provide is confidential. Although Amtrak will be informed of the substance of your job relief claim as part of the negotiating process, the form itself will be disclosed only to the lawyers for the class except as the Court may otherwise order. Failure to fill out either form truthfully will result in disqualification from participation in the settlement.

5. Put it into the appropriate pre-addressed envelope that comes with this letter.

6. Mail it by October 29, 1999. You must add postage.

7. You must keep Class Counsel, Sprenger & Lang, PLLC, 1614 20 th Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20009-1001, Telephone: 202-265-8010, informed of any address change after you mail the Job Relief Election Form. Failure to do so within ninety (90) days of any change of address may result in disqualification of your claim and/or loss of all money which otherwise would have been awarded.

IF THE ENVELOPE CONTAINING YOUR CLAIM OR JOB RELIEF ELECTION FORM IS NOT POSTMARKED BY OCTOBER 29, 1999, IT WILL NOT BE ALLOWED PURSUANT TO LAW.

You will be notified later about the status of your claim. If you have any questions about your claim before you file it, write or telephone Sprenger & Lang.

Michael Lieder Maia Caplan Sprenger & Lang, PLLC 1614 - 20 th Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20009-1001 Phone: (202) 265-8010

(You may leave a recorded message 24 hours a day)

If you have a question about the status of your monetary claim once you've filed it, however, you should direct your inquiry to Class Counsel's agent at:

Amtrak Employment Litigation P.O. Box 4390 Portland, OR 97208-4390 Phone (800) 625-5506

AMTRAK EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION WEBPAGE

On September 1, 1999, Judge Emmet Sullivan of the United States District Court preliminarily approved a settlement reached by Plaintiffs and Defendant Amtrak in a lawsuit alleging race discrimination in employment, entitled McLaurin et al. v. Amtrak. If approved by the Court, this will be a complete settlement of the case and will provide various kinds of relief, including monetary relief, for those eligible members of the class who file timely claims. This proposed settlement does not affect the plaintiffs and class members in the Thornton et al. v. Amtrak lawsuit. The Thornton suit is still in the confidential negotiation process and has not settled to date. As such, Thornton plaintiffs are not eligible to file claims in this process. To find out more about the McLaurin settlement, click the Notice of Settlement button.

As part of the settlement, Amtrak has agreed to pay into a settlement fund a total of eight million dollars. As the Notice of Settlement explains in greater detail, you may be entitled to receive a monetary award from the fund, and possibly entitled to other relief under the settlement, if you are a named plaintiff in the McLaurin lawsuit or a black person who, at any time between January 1, 1995 and September 30, 1999:

a) have been employed by Amtrak in positions, other than positions on Amtrak's Management Committee, not subject to a collective bargaining agreement ("CBA"); and/or,

b) have applied and been rejected by Amtrak for management positions, including applicants who were not then Amtrak employees and those who were then employed by Amtrak in positions subject to a CBA.

If you do not come within either of these definitions, you are not a member of the settlement class and will not be eligible to receive a monetary award or other relief. Even if you are eligible, you will not be able to recover any money or receive any other relief unless you submit a Claim Form or a Job Relief Election Form postmarked on or before October 29, 1999.

To obtain a copy of the Claim Form, the Job Relief Form, and Instructions concerning how to complete them, click on the corresponding buttons. If you prefer to obtain the forms by mail, along with self-addressed return envelopes, contact the Agent for Class Counsel at Amtrak Employment Litigation, P.O. Box 4390, Portland, Oregon 97208-4390, 1-800-625-5506.

To obtain a full copy of the proposed Consent Decree, which sets forth the changes in Amtrak's employment practices, click the Consent Decree button.

Judge Sullivan will preside over a hearing to make a final determination as to whether the settlement is fair on October 25, 1999, at 9:00 a.m. at the United States District Court, 333 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. You have a right to object to or comment on the settlement, or to exclude yourself from the settlement, as explained in greater detail in the Notice of Settlement.

19990922

© 2001 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.