Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

In re Blades

District of Columbia Court of Appeals


February 01, 2001

IN RE GENE G. BLADES, RESPONDENT.

Before Glickman, Associate Judge, and Kern and Nebeker, Senior Judges.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Per Curiam

A Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals

On Report and Recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility

Submitted January 18, 2001

On November 18, 1998, the Court of Appeals of Maryland granted the joint petition of respondent Gene G. Blades and Maryland Bar Counsel to suspend respondent indefinitely from the practice of law. See Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Maryland v. Blades, 720 A.2d 583 (Md. 1998). This discipline by consent followed charges that respondent had violated the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct by filing forged pleadings, forged affidavits and a fictitious subpoena. In response to these charges, respondent proffered that his misconduct was causally related to serious mental illness, and that without prolonged and intensive therapy he would likely be unable to resume practicing law. Because respondent waived a hearing, the record from the Maryland proceeding omits the facts underlying the charges of misconduct, and contains no findings as to the extent of respondent's psychiatric problems.

As reciprocal discipline, and in view of the lack of a factual record, the Board of Professional Responsibility recommends that respondent be suspended indefinitely from practicing law in the District of Columbia, with the right to apply for reinstatement under D.C. Bar R. XI, § 16 (d) after he is reinstated in Maryland or after five years, whichever occurs first. *fn1 The Board further recommends that reinstatement be conditioned on proof by respondent of his fitness to practice law.

Neither Bar Counsel nor respondent object to the Board's report and recommendation. In view of the presumption in favor of identical reciprocal discipline *fn2 and our heightened deference to the Board when its recommendation is unopposed, *fn3 we accept that recommendation in this case. See In re Anagnostiadis, No. 99-BG-1113, slip op. at 3 (D.C. January 11, 2001) (imposing indefinite suspension as reciprocal discipline where "the record of the Maryland proceedings does not fully reveal the nature of respondent's misconduct, and consequently the Board is unable to determine what period of suspension would be appropriate here"). Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that Gene G. Blades is indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia. He may apply for reinstatement after he is reinstated in Maryland or after five years, whichever occurs first. Reinstatement in the District of Columbia shall be conditioned on respondent's proof of his fitness to practice law. As respondent has not filed the affidavit required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14, we direct his attention to the requirements of that rule and their effect on his eligibility for reinstatement. See D.C. Bar XI, § 16 (c).

So ordered.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.