Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Microsoft Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA


February 28, 2002

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
MICROSOFT CORPORATION, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Colleen Kollar-kotelly United States District Judge

ORDER

Before the Court is ProComp's motion to intervene, and in the alternative, to participate as amicus curiae. For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is this 28th day of February, 2002, hereby

ORDERED that ProComp's motion to intervene is DENIED; and it is further

ORDERED that ProComp's motion to participate as amicus curiae is GRANTED in part. ProComp shall be permitted to assist the Court in the role of amicus curiae in the following manner:

• ProComp may file a reply memorandum, as described in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, not exceeding twenty-five pages;

• If ProComp prefers that the Court review its amicus reply brief prior to the Tunney Act hearing, it shall file its brief with the Court and deliver a courtesy copy to chambers not later than 5 p.m. on March 4, 2002. Otherwise, ProComp shall file its reply brief not later than 10 a.m. on March 11, 2002;

• ProComp may present not more than ten minutes of oral argument during the Tunney Act hearing; and it is further ORDERED that, if ProComp chooses to present argument to the Court at the upcoming Tunney Act hearing, it shall identify the individual who will be addressing the Court not later than 10 a.m. on March 4, 2002.

SO ORDERED.

20020228

© 2002 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.