July 03, 2002
IN RE GREGORY JOHN SCHWARTZ, RESPONDENT. A MEMBER OF THE BAR OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS
Before Farrell and Washington, Associate Judges, and King, Senior
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Per Curiam
On Report and Recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility
On July 19, 2001, the Court of Appeals of Maryland suspended respondent Gregory John Schwartz for eighteen months, stayed all but sixty days of the suspension, and ordered respondent to pay costs in the amount of $959.25. The suspension was based on a joint petition for suspension by consent in which respondent acknowledged that he was facing disciplinary charges for allegedly depositing personal funds into his trust account, and in bad faith filing and voluntarily dismissing multiple bankruptcy petitions and assisting his wife in doing the same in an effort to prevent the foreclosure of their residence.
Upon learning of respondent's suspension in Maryland, this court temporarily suspended respondent on August 14, 2001, pursuant to D.C. Bar R. XI, § 11 (d), and referred the matter to the Board on Professional Responsibility ("Board"). We lifted respondent's temporary suspension on October 11, 2001, following his reinstatement in Maryland.
The Board has now filed a report concluding that respondent violated Rules 4.4, 8.4 (a), and 8.4 (d) of the District of Columbia Rules of Professional Conduct, *fn1 and recommending that we impose identical reciprocal discipline. The Board further recommends that this suspension be imposed nunc pro tunc to July 19, 2001, the date of respondent's suspension in Maryland, because he timely filed the affidavits required by In re Goldberg, 460 A.2d 982, 984-85 (D.C. 1983), and D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14 (g).
Both Bar Counsel and respondent have indicated that they do not take exception to the Board's recommendation. *fn2 Given our limited scope of review in uncontested disciplinary cases and the presumption in favor of identical reciprocal discipline, we adopt the Board's recommendation. See In re Goldsborough, 654 A.2d 1285 (D.C. 1995); In re Zilberberg, 612 A.2d 832, 834 (D.C. 1992); D.C. Bar R. XI, § 11 (f). Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that Gregory John Schwartz be suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for the period of eighteen months, with all but sixty days stayed, nunc pro tunc to July 19, 2001.