United States District Court, District of Columbia
April 1, 2003
IN RE: VITAMINS ANTITRUST LITIGATION THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: CARGILL, INCORPORATED, ET AL.
F. HOFFMANN-LAROCHE LTD., ET AL.,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Thomas F. Hogan, United States District Judge.
DEFENDANT TAKEDA VITAMIN & FOOD USA, INC.
This matter being presented to the Court in connection with the Motion of Cargill, Incorporated, The Iams Company, Agribrands International, Inc., CSA Nutrition, Inc. (f/k/a Carl S. Akey, Inc. and also known as CSA Nutrition Services, Inc.), Nestle Purina PetCare Company (f/k/a Ralston Purina Company and also known as Nestle Ralston PetCare Company), Ralcorp Holdings, Inc., and The Coca-Cola Company (collectively the "Cargill Plaintiffs") to Dismiss Defendant Takeda Vitamin & Food USA, Inc. with Prejudice, it is hereby
ORDERED that the Fourth Amended Complaint in this action is dismissed with prejudice solely against defendant Takeda Vitamin & Food USA, Inc. This Order is without prejudice to the Cargill Plaintiffs' rights or claims against any other defendant or alleged co-conspirator in this litigation.
© 1992-2003 VersusLaw Inc.