Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

ONCOLOGY & RADIATION ASSOCIATES

May 13, 2003

ONCOLOGY & RADIATION ASSOCIATES, P.A., PLAINTIFF
v.
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY AND ABI, DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Emmet G. Sullivan, United States District Judge

ORDER CONDITIONALLY CERTIFYING SETTLEMENT CLASS, PRELIMINARILY APPROVING PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, AND AUTHORIZING NOTICE TO BE SENT TO THE CLASS
Upon review and consideration of the (i) Stipulation of Settlement dated March 14, 2003, executed on behalf of Plaintiff Oncology & Radiation Associates, P.A. ("Plaintiff", individually and as representative of the proposed class (as defined herein), and on behalf of Bristol-Myers Squibb Company ("Bristol"), and the exhibits attached thereto; and (ii) Stipulation of Settlement dated May 8, 2003, executed on behalf of Plaintiff Oncology & Radiation Associates, P.A. ("Plaintiff"), individually and as representative of the proposed class (as defined herein), and on behalf of American BioScience, Inc. ("ABI") (collectively, the "Settlement Agreements"), it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. This Court finds that it has jurisdiction over this Action and each of the parties to the Settlement Agreements.

2. The terms of the Settlement Agreements are hereby preliminarily approved and discovery is hereby stayed except to the extent discovery is necessary with respect to opt outs and for purposes of administering and consummating the Settlement Agreements, subject to further consideration thereof at the hearing on final settlement (the "Fairness Hearing") provided for below. The Court finds that the settlement encompassed by the Settlement Agreements (the "Settlement") is sufficiently within the range of reasonableness so that notice of the Settlement should be given as provided in Paragraphs 6, 7 and 8 of this Order.

CLASS CERTIFICATION

3. Pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court hereby conditionally finds that the prerequisites for a class action have been met and conditionally certifies the following class (the "Class") for settlement purposes only:

All persons and entities in the United States who purchased Taxol directly from Bristol or its subsidiaries at any time from January 1, 1999, through March 14, 2003. Excluded from the class are defendants, their parents, subsidiaries and affiliates, and government entities.
4. The Court further hereby conditionally finds that Plaintiff is an adequate class representative for the Class. If the Settlement Agreements are terminated or are not consummated for any reason whatsoever, the certification of the Class shall be void, and Plaintiff, Bristol and ABI (the "Settling Entities") shall have reserved all of their rights to propose or oppose any and all class certification motions and to contest the adequacy of Plaintiff as a representative of any putative plaintiff class.

5. Cohen, Milstein, Hausfeld & Toll, P.L.L.C. is appointed as lead counsel for the Class ("Lead Counsel").

NOTICE TO POTENTIAL CLASS MEMBERS

6. Within 20 days after the date of entry of this Order, Lead Counsel shall cause copies of the Notices of Proposed Settlement and Settlement Hearing, substantially in the form attached as Exhibit A hereto, to be mailed by first class mail, postage prepaid, to all members of the Class, to the extent that they can be identified with reasonable diligence.

7. Lead Counsel shall cause to be published a summary notice, which shall be substantially in the form attached as Exhibit B hereto ("Publication Notice") one day a week for two consecutive weeks in the Modern Healthcare Magazine and The Pink Sheet, as soon as practicable after Mail Notice, and in all events, at least 30 days prior to the Fairness Hearing.

8. Prior to the Fairness Hearing, Lead Counsel shall serve and file a sworn statement attesting to compliance with the provisions of Paragraphs 6 and 7 of this Order.

9. The foregoing notice provisions are hereby found to be the best means of providing notice under the circumstances and, when completed, shall constitute due and sufficient notice of the Settlement and the Fairness Hearing to all persons affected by and/or entitled to participate in the Settlement, in full compliance with the notice requirements of Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and due process.

CLAIMS ADMINISTRATION

10. To effectuate the Settlement and Notice provisions, Lead Counsel has designated Complete Claim Solutions as the Settlement Administrator, which designation is hereby approved, to be responsible for: (a) establishing a P.O. Box and toll-free phone number (to be included in the Notices to the Class) for the purpose of communicating with Class members; (b) disseminating notices to the Class; (c) accepting and maintaining documents sent from Class members including opt-out forms, claim forms, and other documents relating to claims administration; and (d) administering claims for allocation of funds among Class members.

11. As described in the Notices to the Class, any Class member may opt out of the Class by mailing a completed Request for Exclusion to the Settlement Administrator within 45 days after the date on which Notice is mailed to the Class. Persons or entities that request exclusion from the Class will not be entitled to share the benefits of Settlement, nor be bound by any judgment, whether favorable or adverse.

12. Any potential member of the Class that does not properly and timely mail a Request for Exclusion as set forth in Paragraph 11 above shall be included in the Class and shall be bound by all the terms and provisions of the Settlement Agreement, whether or not such potential member of the Class shall have objected to the Settlement and whether or not such potential member of the Class makes a claim upon or participates in the Settlement.

FEE PETITION, INCENTIVE AWARD, AND MOTIONS FOR FINAL APPROVAL AND APPROVAL OF PROPOSED PLAN OF ALLOCATION
13. On or before June 15, 2003, counsel for the Class shall file their application for attorneys' fees and expenses (the "Fee Petition"), an application for an incentive award for Plaintiff a motion for final approval of the Settlement, and a motion for approval of their proposed plan of allocation of net settlement proceeds to the Class.

THE FAIRNESS HEARING

14. A Fairness Hearing is hereby scheduled to be held on August 12, 2003 at 11:30 a.m. in Courtroom One before the undersigned to consider: (a) the fairness, reasonableness and adequacy of the Settlement; (b) the Fee Petition and application for an incentive award, and (c) whether to approve the proposed plan of allocation.

15. Any member of the Class that has not filed a Request for Exclusion in the manner set forth above may appear at the Fairness Hearing in person or by counsel and may be heard, to the extent allowed by the Court, either in support of or in opposition to the fairness, reasonableness and adequacy of the Settlement, the Fee Petition and incentive award, or plan of allocation; provided, however, that no person shall be heard in opposition to the Settlement, the Fee Petition and incentive award, or plan of allocation, and no papers or briefs submitted by or on behalf of any such person shall be accepted or considered by the Court, unless on or before a date to be set in a subsequent order (but in no event less than thirty (30) days before the Fairness Hearing), such person: (a) files with the Clerk of the Court a notice of such person's intention to appear as well as a statement that indicates the basis for such person's opposition to the Settlement, the Fee Petition and incentive award, or plan of allocation and any documentation in support of such opposition; and (b) serves copies of such notice, statement and documentation, as well as any other papers or briefs that such person files with the Court, either in person or by mail, upon Lead Counsel and counsel for Bristol and ABI.

16. The date and time of the Fairness Hearing shall be set forth in the Mail Notice and Publication Notice, but shall be subject to adjournment by the Court without further notice to the members of the Class other than that which may be posted at the Court and on the Court's website.

OTHER PROVISIONS

17. Terms used in this Order that are defined in the Settlement Agreements are, unless otherwise defined herein, used in this Order as defined in the Settlement Agreements.

18. In the event the Settlements are terminated in accordance with the provisions of the Settlement Agreements, the Settlement and all proceedings had in connection therewith shall be null and void, except insofar as expressly provided to the contrary in the Settlement Agreements, and without prejudice to the status quo ante rights of Plaintiff, Bristol and ABI, and the members of the Class.

19. If the Settlements are terminated or ultimately not approved, the Court will modify any existing scheduling order to ensure that the Plaintiff and Defendants will have sufficient time to prepare for the resumption of litigation, including but not limited to the completion of discovery, preparation of expert reports, the filing of a summary judgment motion or motions, and preparation of trial.

SO ORDERED.

STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

This stipulation of settlement ("Settlement Agreement") is made and entered into as of this 14th day of March, 2003, between the named plaintiff in the above-captioned action (the "Action"), Oncology & Radiation Associates, P.A. ("Plaintiff"), individually and as representative of the proposed direct purchaser class in this Action, as defined in Section I.C below (the "Class"), and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company ("Bristol").

WHEREAS:

A. Plaintiff commenced this Action on November 6, 2001, against Bristol and filed an amended complaint against Bristol and American BioScience Inc. ("ABI") on October 4, 2002 (the "Complaint");

B. Plaintiff brought this Action pursuant to the federal antitrust laws on behalf of itself and all non-governmental entities in the United States who purchased Taxol directly from Bristol since January 1, 1999, seeking treble damages and other relief as permitted by the federal antitrust laws;

C. Plaintiff alleges in the Complaint that Bristol (i) fraudulently obtained U.S. patent No. 5,641,803 (the "`803 patent") and U.S. patent No. 5,670,537 (the "`537 patent"), (ii) wrongfully listed the `803 patent and `537 patent in the Food and Drug Administration's ("FDA") Orange Book and (iii) commenced sham patent infringement litigation with respect to the `537 patent and `803 patent against manufacturers of generic substitutes of Taxol for the purpose of delaying entry into the market of generic substitutes of Taxol. As a result, Plaintiff alleges that it and the Class paid substantially more for Taxol than they would have paid in the absence of the allegedly wrongful conduct;

D. Plaintiff also alleges in the Complaint that Bristol conspired with ABI to wrongfully list U.S. patent No. 6,090,331 (the "`331 patent") in the Orange Book and to commence sham patent infringement litigation with respect to the `331 patent against manufacturers of generic substitutes of Taxol for the purpose of delaying entry into the market of generic substitutes of Taxol. As a result, Plaintiff alleges that it and the Class paid substantially more for Taxol than they would have paid in the absence of the allegedly wrongful conduct;

E. Since the filing of this Action, the Parties have engaged in extensive analysis of the pertinent facts. Plaintiff's counsel have conducted an extensive investigation relating to the claims and underlying events alleged in the Complaint, including (i) the analysis of documents produced in discovery and (ii) extensive legal research. Plaintiff's counsel have also retained and consulted with economists and other experts with respect to damages allegedly sustained by the Class as a result of the wrongful conduct alleged in the Complaint. As a result, Plaintiff's counsel are thoroughly familiar with issues of liability and damages with respect to the claims asserted in the Complaint;

F. Bristol has denied, and continues to deny, that it committed any violation of law or any wrongdoing, and further denies it has any liability with respect to any claims asserted in the Complaint and denies any and all liability to Plaintiff and the Class;

G. Over the course of the Parties' extensive arm's-length negotiations, Plaintiff's counsel have concluded that the proposed settlement with Bristol embodied in this Settlement Agreement is fair, adequate and reasonable, and in the best interests of the Class. Among the factors considered in this Action are: (1) the sharply contested legal and factual issues involved in this Action as they relate to Bristol; (2) the risks attendant upon further prosecution of this Action; and (3) the substantial benefits to be received by the proposed Class pursuant to this Settlement Agreement;

H. Bristol, likewise recognizing the costs and uncertainties attendant upon further litigation of the claims in this Action, and while continuing to deny vigorously Plaintiff's allegations and any liability with respect to any and all claims asserted in the Complaint, has concluded that it is desirable that all of the claims in this Action that have, or could have, been asserted against Bristol be compromised and settled. The resolution of the claims asserted in the Complaint will terminate the costly process of litigation and put to rest forever the controversy surrounding matters at issue in this Action as they relate to Bristol; and

I. It is the intention of the Parties that the proposed Settlement resolve all claims of the Class against Bristol that were, or could have been, asserted in this Action, or that relate to the subject matter of this Action.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and among the Parties, through their undersigned counsel, subject to Court approval pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(e), and to all of the terms and conditions set forth herein, as follows:

I. DEFINITIONS

The following definitions shall apply throughout this Settlement Agreement:

A. "Bristol" means Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in New York, New York, and its divisions, subsidiaries, and affiliates.

B. "Bristol's Counsel" means Cravath, Swaine & Moore, Worldwide Plaza, 825 Eight Avenue, New York, New York 10019.

C. "Class" means the class to be certified for settlement purposes only pursuant to this Settlement Agreement, which shall include all non-governmental Persons that purchased Taxol directly from Bristol since January 1, 1999, through the date of this Settlement Agreement.

D. "Class Counsel" means the following law firms and attorneys:

COHEN, MILSTEIN, HAUSFELD & TOLL, P.L.L.C. Linda P. Nussbaum Jacqueline E. Bryks 825 Third Avenue, 30th Floor New York, N.Y. 10022 Telephone: (212) 838-7797 Facsimile: (212) 838-7745
COHEN, MILSTEIN, HAUSFELD & TOLL, P.L.L.C. Michael D. Hausfeld 1100 New York Avenue, N.W. West Tower, Suite 500 Washington, D.C. 20005-3934 Telephone: (202) 408-4600 Facsimile: (202) 408-4699
STEARNS WEAVER MILLER WEISSLER ALHADEFF & SITTERSON Jay B. Shapiro Museum Tower, Suite 2200 150 West Flagler Street Miami, Florida 33130 Telephone: (305) 789-3200 Facsimile: (305) 789-3395
LASH & GOLDBERG LLP Alan D. Lash 100 S.E. 2nd Street, Suite 1200 Miami, FL 33131 ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.