Court of Appeals BDN: 9-04
Before: Schwelb and Reid, Associate Judges; and King, Senior Judge.
On consideration of the affidavit of Alan F. Post, wherein he consents to disbarrment from the Bar of the District of Columbia pursuant to § 12 of Rule XI of the Rules Governing the Bar of the District of Columbia, which affidavit has been filed with the Clerk of this Court, and the report and recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility with respect thereto, and it appearing that respondent filed with the Court on February 17, 2004, an affidavit pursuant to D.C. Bar Rule XI, § 14 (g), it is this 1 day of April, 2004st
ORDERED that the said Alan F. Post, is hereby disbarred by consent effective forthwith. The effective date of respondent's disbarrment should run, for reinstatement purposes, nunc pro tunc to February 17, 2004, the date respondent filed his affidavit pursuant to D.C. Bar Rule XI, § 14 (g). It is
FURTHER ORDERED that this reciprocal matter, No. 04-BG-26, be dismissed as moot without prejudice to Bar Counsel's reinstating a reciprocal discipline proceeding if respondent seeks reinstatement to the District of Columbia Bar while his Maryland disbarrment is still in effect.
The Clerk shall publish this order, but the affidavit shall not be publicly disclosed or otherwise made available except upon order of the Court or upon written consent of the respondent.
The Clerk shall cause a copy of this order to be transmitted to the Chairman of the Board on Professional Responsibility and to the respondent, thereby giving him notice of the provisions of Rule XI, § 14 (g), with which respondent appears to have complied, and § 16, which set forth certain rights and responsibilities of disbarred attorneys and the effect of failure to comply therewith.
© 1992-2004 VersusLaw ...