Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

ANYANWUTAKU v. WILSON

United States District Court for the District of Columbia


April 5, 2005.

KINGSLEY ANYANWUTAKU, Plaintiff,
v.
EDWARD P. WILSON., et al., Defendants.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: COLLEEN KOTELLY, District Judge

ORDER

On February 10, 2005, Magistrate Judge Facciola issued his Report and Recommendation [54], in which he recommends that Defendants Robert Cerullo and Houlon & Berman, LLC's Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment [22] should be granted.

As Magistrate Judge Facciola noted in his Report and Recommendation, the parties were entitled to object to his recommendations, and a failure to do so would constitute a waiver of their right to appeal a ruling by this Court adopting his recommendations. Under Rule 72(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure parties are entitled to file objections to a magistrate judge's order within 10 days after being served with the order. The Court need not conduct a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which no objections have been raised. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985).

  As of April 5, 2005, no objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, it is this 5th day of April, 2005, hereby

  ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Facciola's Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED IN FULL; it is further ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, or, in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment [22] is GRANTED.

20050405

© 1992-2005 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.