Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

HEARN v. U.S.

United States District Court, D. Columbia


August 2, 2005.

MICHAEL HENRY HEARN, Plaintiff,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: ROSEMARY COLLYER, District Judge

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court for consideration of plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis and pro se complaint. The Court will grant the application, and dismiss the complaint.

Plaintiff had filed a habeas action in this district, which the Court transferred to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi. Dissatisfied with that court's ruling, plaintiff purports to file a motion for relief from judgment or order pursuant to Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

  The courts of appeals "shall have jurisdiction of appeals from all final decisions of the district courts of the United States." 28 U.S.C. ยง 1291. This Court cannot review decisions rendered by another district court.

  The Court will dismiss this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion will be issued separately on this same date.

20050802

© 1992-2005 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.