United States District Court, D. Columbia
September 16, 2005.
DAWN V. MARTIN, Plaintiff,
HOWARD UNIVERSITY, et al., Defendants.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: THOMAS HOGAN, Chief Judge, District
Pending before the Court are the Report and Recommendation
issued by Magistrate Judge Facciola, Plaintiff's objection, and
Defendants' response to that objection. After reviewing the
Report and Recommendation, the parties' relevant filings, and the
entire record in this matter, this Court finds no factual or
legal basis for Plaintiff's objection. For the reasons provided
in the Report and Recommendation, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is denied.
2. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is granted as to
Plaintiff's claims of retaliation based on decisions to convert
or leave vacant certain positions, and denied as to all other
© 1992-2005 VersusLaw Inc.