UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
October 21, 2005
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
ROBERT E. QUINN, MICHAEL H. HOLLAND, MOHAMMED A. SHARBAF DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: John D. Bates United States District Judge
Upon consideration of parties' motions and memoranda, the arguments presented to the Court at the motions hearing on October 14, 2005, and the entire record herein, and for the reasons stated in the Memorandum Opinion issued on this date, it is this 21st day of October, 2005, hereby
ORDERED that  defendants' motion for transfer of venue is DENIED; it is further ORDERED that  the government's motion to strike portions of the indictment is GRANTED; it is further
ORDERED that  defendants' motion to dismiss the indictment for failure to charge a cognizable offense is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; it is further
ORDERED that [31 & 34] defendants' motions to strike from the indictment alleged surplusage are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; it is further
ORDERED that  defendants' as-applied due process challenge to the laws underlying the offenses alleged is DENIED; it is further
ORDERED that  defendants' motion to dismiss Counts Two through Six for failure to state an offense is DENIED; it is further
ORDERED that  defendants' motion to dismiss the indictment as duplicitous is DENIED; and it is further
ORDERED that  defendants' motion for a supplemental jury questionnaire is DENIED.
© 1992-2005 VersusLaw Inc.