UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
November 7, 2006
WILLIAM HENRY HARRISON, PLAINTIFF,
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: James Robertson United States District Judge
Plaintiff challenges a policy of the Bureau of Prisons ("BOP") that denies him unfettered access to his presentence investigation report ("PSR").*fn1 When BOP did not respond to this challenge, the Court invited a motion addressing the merits of plaintiff's claim. BOP then filed a supplemental brief in support of its motion to dismiss, although no motion to dismiss was pending.*fn2 The Court will treat BOP's response as a motion to dismiss.
The policy to which plaintiff refers is BOP Program Statement 1351.05 ("P.S. 1351.05"), which governs the release of BOP information under the Freedom of Information ("FOIA") and Privacy Acts. In relevant part, P.S. 1351.05 expressly prohibits inmates from obtaining or possessing photocopies of their PSRs:
Federal Presentence Reports (PSR) and Statements of Reasons (SOR) from Judgments in Criminal Cases. For safety and security reasons, inmates are prohibited from obtaining or possessing photocopies of their PSRs, SORs, or other equivalent non-U.S. Code sentencing documents (e.g., D.C., state, foreign, military, etc.). Inmates violating this provision are subject to disciplinary action.
P.S. 1351.05 at 15 ¶ 12(a)(2)(d). Plaintiff asserts that the program statement violates his rights under FOIA.*fn3
P.S. 1351.05 affords a federal inmate the opportunity to review his PSR and to take notes on it:
Inmates must be provided reasonable opportunities to access and review their PSRs, SORs, or other equivalent non-U.S. Code sentencing documents (e.g., D.C., state, foreign, military, etc.).
P.S. 1351.05 at 15 ¶ 12(d)(1). An inmate who is afforded this opportunity is not entitled under FOIA to obtain or possess a copy of his PSR. Martinez v. Bureau of Prisons, 444 F.3d 620, 625 (D.C. Cir. 2006) (per curiam); Levi v. Nash, No. 04-5233, 2005 WL 3610346 (D.C. Cir. Mar. 24, 2005) (per curiam). One panel of the Fourth Circuit apparently disagrees, see United States v. Pugh, 69 Fed. Appx. 628, 629 (4th Cir. 2003) (per curiam), but controlling precedent in this Circuit is clear. "Moreover, [P.S. 1351.05] sets forth reasons, based on concerns about inmate safety, for prohibiting inmates from keeping copies of their PSRs in their cells and reflects a judgment regarding prison administration that a court would be loath to second-guess." Martinez, 444 F.3d at 625.
The Court will grant defendant's motion to dismiss. An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion will be issued separately on this same date.