UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
May 16, 2007
JIMMY GRIMES, PLAINTIFF,
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Ellen Segal Huvelle United States District Judge
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
In this action brought pro se under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, plaintiff alleges that he is being detained at the District of Columbia's Central Detention Facility on a defective parole violator warrant that was lodged on February 7, 2001, but not executed until February 16, 2007. Plaintiff also accuses the United States Parole Commission of depriving him of a timely probable cause hearing following his arrest in February 2007. Plaintiff seeks monetary damages and his immediate release from custody and parole supervision.
Because plaintiff's success would necessarily invalidate his detention, he cannot obtain relief under § 1983 without first invalidating the warrant through, inter alia, a writ of habeas corpus. See Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 486-87 (1994). Therefore, pursuant to the screening provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, the Court hereby dismisses the § 1983 claim without prejudice and construes the claim for injunctive relief as a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that within twenty (20) days of service of a copy of this Order and the petition (as construed), respondents, by counsel, shall file with this Court and serve on the petitioner a statement showing why the Writ of Habeas Corpus should not issue; and it is
FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to furnish a copy of the petition and a certified copy of this Order to the United States Marshals Service for the purpose of making service of same on the named respondents, petitioner's custodian, the United States Attorney for the District of Columbia and the Attorney General for the District of Columbia.
© 1992-2007 VersusLaw Inc.