UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
January 18, 2008
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
MICHAEL C. IRVING, DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Paul L. Friedman United States District Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
The Court has before it the Government's Motions in Limine to Exclude Evidence of Defendant's Awards and Commendations . The government argues that evidence of Detective Irving's professional awards should be excluded because (1) the awards do not reflect "pertinent" character traits and therefore are inadmissible under Rule 404(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Evidence, and (2) even assuming that the awards reflect pertinent traits, they are inadmissible under Rule 405(b) of the Federal Rules of Evidence because they amount to specific instances of conduct offered to show non-essential elements of a charge, claim, or defense.
The Court agrees. The awards and commendations are inadmissible under Rule 404(a)(1) because the work-related traits they reflect are not pertinent to the crimes with which Detective Irving is charged; those allegations are plainly unrelated to Detective Irving's professional competence and integrity. See United States v. Washington, 106 F.3d 983, 999-1000 (D.C. Cir. 1997); see also United States v. Nazzaro, 889 F.2d 1158, 1168 (1st Cir. 1989). Moreover, as evidence of specific instances of conduct, the awards may be offered only to show traits that are "essential element[s] of a charge, claim, or defense" in this case. FED. R. EVID. 405(b). See United States v. Brown, 503 F. Supp. 2d 239, 243-44 (D.D.C. 2007). The Court concludes that the awards do not reflect such "essential" traits. Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED that the Government's Motions in Limine to Exclude Evidence of Defendant's Awards and Commendations  is GRANTED.
© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.