Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Taylor v. Team Broadcast

August 20, 2009

WENZEL O. TAYLOR, PLAINTIFF,
v.
TEAM BROADCAST, LLC, DEFENDANT.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Royce C. Lamberth, United States District Judge,

MEMORANDUM

Upon consideration of defendants' Motion for Reconsideration [26], the Motion will be granted. The original Motion for Summary Judgment [20] will be denied without prejudice pending an opportunity for counsel for Mr. Taylor to enter an appearance.

I. Background

Wenzel Taylor was hired by Team Broadcast Services ("Team") in December 2003.

During his first four months with Team, Mr. Taylor was observed appearing to sleep at his desk, which was in a near-dark room with television monitors. After a discussion with Team management, Mr. Taylor was seen by a physician who diagnosed him with sleep apnea. Mr. Taylor informed Team of his condition soon thereafter. Mr. Taylor was fired on May 28, 2004, allegedly in response to two additional incidents where he was seen sleeping on the job, though Mr. Taylor denies that these incidents took place. Mr. Taylor originally filed this suit in D.C. Superior Court on September 23, 2005 and Team removed it to this Court on November 4, 2005. After difficulties with discovery, Team filed a motion for summary judgment on December 18, 2006. That motion was denied on April 23, 2007 and this Court decided to appoint counsel for Mr. Taylor so that the case could proceed. Team filed this motion for reconsideration of the summary judgment decision on May 3, 2007.

II. Legal Standard

Team is correct that this Court wrongly applied precedent and misallocated the burden of proof when it decided the motion for summary judgment. In holding that Team, the defendant, had the burden of demonstrating that Mr. Taylor was not disabled, this Court incorrectly concluded that Team had not met its burden and that summary judgment should be denied. It is Mr. Taylor who has the burden of showing all the elements of a valid claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA") in order for the suit to go forward; the defendant need only show a failure on one of the elements to prevail on summary judgment.

The correct standard is that the plaintiff must establish that:

1) He is disabled under the terms of the ADA, meaning that

a. He has a mental or physical impairment causing him to be 'substantially limited' in performing a 'major life activity',

b. He has a record of such an impairment, or

c. He was regarded as having such an impairment;

2) He was otherwise qualified to perform his duties with or without ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.