Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Young v. Covington & Burling

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA


January 28, 2010

YOLANDA YOUNG, PLAINTIFF,
v.
COVINGTON & BURLING, LLP, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Reggie B. Walton United States District Judge

ORDER

For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Counts II and VII Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Specifically, the component of Count II based on the theory thatCovington's non-promotion policy is discriminatory is dismissed as time-barred. Additionally, Count VII of the amended complaint, which asserts a claim of negligent supervision, is dismissed. However, the motion is denied as to the component of Count II which asserts a disparate impact claim based on the theory that Covington's job-assignment policy was racially discriminatory.

SO ORDERED this 28th day of January, 2010.

20100128

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.