Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

In re Stiller

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS


November 12, 2010

IN RE: BARRY S. STILLER, RESPONDENT.

Per curiam.

BDN: 430-88

BEFORE: *fn1Wagner, Chief Judge; *fn2Terry, Steadman, Schwelb, Farrell, Ruiz, Reid, Glickman, Washington, Associate Judges; and *fn3Pryor, Senior Judge.

ORDER

On consideration of petitioners' petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc, and respondent's response thereto, it is

ORDERED by the merits division* that the petition for rehearing is denied. See In re Slattery, 767 A2d 203, 206 (D.C. 2001). "(holding Stiller in accord with principle that '[t]here is no requirement in either [subsection (b) or (c) of Rule 8.4] that an attorney actually have been convicted of a crime for the rule to apply)." And it appearing that the majority of the judges of this court have voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for rehearing en banc is denied.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.