UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
November 30, 2010
ERNEST L. DIXON, PLAINTIFF,
SIXTEEN HUNDRED PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE POLICE, DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Ricardo M. Urbina United States District Judge
Re Document No.
GRANTING THE DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS AS CONCEDED
This matter is before the court on the defendant's motion to dismiss. On September 1,2010, the pro se plaintiff filed a handwritten one-page complaint against "Sixteen Hundred Pennsylvania Avenue Police." See generally Compl. In his complaint, the plaintiff states that he is suing the Sixteen Hundred Pen[n]sylvania Avenue Police for $999,000,000,000,000,000.00 for harassment, searching me on my property and depriving me of my mansion to wit: Sixteen Hundred Pen[n]sylvania Avenue Washington, E.D. without due process of law[.] Also I am suing the said for the [amount] of $999,000,000,000,000,000.00 for punitive damages.
Compl. at 1.
On November 1, 2010, the Secret Service filed a motion to dismiss the plaintiff's complaint.*fn1 See generally Secret Service's Mot. to Dismiss. The same day, the court issued a Fox-Neal order directing the plaintiff to respond to the pending motion to dismiss by November 22, 2010 and advising the plaintiff that his failure to respond to the motion could result in the court deeming the matter conceded. Order (Nov. 1, 2010).
To date, the plaintiff has not responded to the motion to dismiss. His failure to do so permits the court to treat the motion as conceded. Fox
Am. Airlines, Inc., 389 F.3d 1291, 1294-95 (D.C. Cir. 2004). Accordingly, the court grants the motion to dismiss. An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is separately and contemporaneously issued this 30th
day of November, 2010.