Before FISHER and BLACKBURNE-RIGSBY, Associate Judges, and NEBEKER, Senior Judge.
We refer the reader to Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Bleecker, supra, for a detailed account of respondent's misconduct. In brief, the Maryland court established that the respondent committed grave and serious misconduct including, but not limited to,*fn2 failing to correct a prior false statement (the date of the accident) to the Maryland Circuit Court causing extensive waste of judicial time and resources; failing to respond to Bar Counsel's written requests for information during Counsel's investigation of the complaint lodged against him; and by precluding his client from acquiring recompense from severe injuries sustained in an automobile accident by failing to file suit before the statute of limitations lapsed, and thereafter, concealing his failures from his client. After the Statute of Limitations had lapsed, and without his client's knowledge or consent, respondent filed a complaint averring an incorrect accident date and sent a demand letter indicating a settlement sum. After his client learned from a third party that her case had been dismissed, respondent failed to advise his client to seek advice of independent counsel regarding potential claims against him. The gravamen of respondent's extensive misconduct, his failure to file suit within the Statute of Limitations, his failure to correct a false statement to a tribunal, and his failure to respond to Maryland Bar Counsel's investigatory efforts, warrants the severest of sanctions available in this jurisdiction for the protection of the public: disbarrment. See, e.g., In re Steinberg, 953 A.2d 306, 307 (D.C. 2008 ) (per curiam) (disbarring attorney where attorney "committed serious and protracted acts of neglect and was dishonest with clients, opposing counsel, and tribunals"); In re Foster, 699 A.2d 1110 (D.C. 1997) (per curiam) (disbarring attorney for neglect and dishonesty); In re Goffe, 641 A.2d 458 (D.C. 1994) (per curiam) (disbarring attorney for misconduct involving dishonesty and the manufacture of documents submitted to tribunal); In re Schneider, 951 A.2d 798, 799 (D.C. 2008) (per curiam) (disbarring attorney in reciprocal disbarrment in Maryland for failure to file timely complaint, attempts to conceal neglect and by paying client with his personal funds).*fn3
Respondent's misconduct, considered in its totality without regard to a presumption to disbar, warrants substantially similar sanctions in this jurisdiction as that imposed by the state of Maryland.*fn4
Respondent has not demonstrated elsewise by clear and convincing evidence. Accordingly, since respondent has not shown why reciprocal discipline should not be imposed, it is ORDERED that Lorin Bleecker, Esquire, is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia.