UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
March 3, 2011
JOSEPH R. WAKER, JR., PLAINTIFF,
DEVON BROWN ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Paul L. Friedman United States District Judge
Pending before the Court is the motion of the remaining defendant, the DistrictColumbia, to dismiss the complaint. See Order of December 9, 2010 (dismissing the complaintagainst the individual defendants). By Order of January 6, 2011, plaintiff, proceeding pro se,was advised consistent with Fox v. Strickland, 837 F.2d 507 (D.C. Cir. 1988), about hisobligation to respond to the District of Columbia's motion by February 7, 2011, or risk dismissalof the complaint on a conceded motion. Plaintiff has neither filed a response nor soughtadditional time to do so. The Court therefore will treat the pending motion as conceded and willnow dismiss the case. A separate Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.