Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Matthew Bullock v. District of Columbia

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA


March 31, 2011

MATTHEW BULLOCK, PLAINTIFF,
v.
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Robert L. Wilkins United States District Judge

On February 9, 2011, the defendants filed a motion for partial judgment on the pleadings and for summary judgment under Rules 12(c) and 56(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court advised the plaintiff of his obligations under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the local rules of this Court to respond to the motion, and specifically warned plaintiff that, if he did not respond to the motion by February 10, 2001, the Court may treat the motion as conceded.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

To date, the plaintiff neither has filed an opposition to the motion and nor has requested more time to do so. Accordingly, the Court will grant the defendants' motion as conceded, dismiss all claims (Counts I-VII) against the District of Columbia, and dismiss the claims of negligent infliction of emotional distress and negligence (Counts V-VI) against Carlos Heraud. An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

20110331

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.