Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Okezie I. Onyeanusi v. District of Columbia

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA


April 27, 2012

OKEZIE I. ONYEANUSI, PLAINTIFF,
v.
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Paul L. Friedman United States District Judge

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Plaintiff Okezie Onyeanusi has written a letter to the Court requesting the reinstatement of his lawsuit, which was dismissed for want of prosecution after Mr. Onyeanusi repeatedly failed to appear for status conferences without notifying the Court of the reasons for his absences. See Order (May 26, 2011) [Dkt. No. 32]; Motion for Order to Reinstate Case [Dkt. No. 33]. In response to Mr. Onyeanusi's letter, the Court ordered the defendant, the District of Columbia, to show cause (1) why the letter should not be treated as a motion under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and (2) why the motion should not be granted. See Minute Order (Mar. 21, 2012). The defendant has now submitted its response. The defendant does not object to treating Mr. Onyeanusi's letter as a motion under Rule 60(b), but it argues that the motion should be denied because Mr. Onyeanusi has not satisfied either of the two criteria that arguably could justify relief from the Court's order dismissing his case. Specifically, the defendant contends that Mr. Onyeanusi has not demonstrated that his failure to appear resulted from "excusable neglect" under Rule 60(b)(1) or that there is "any other reason that justifies relief" under Rule 60(b)(6). See Response [Dkt. No. 34] at 3-5.

The Court will give Mr. Onyeanusi an opportunity to reply to the defendant's arguments. If Mr. Onyeanusi has nothing to add to his original letter, the Court nevertheless would like him to reaffirm his continued desire and ability to proceed with his case. The Court therefore will order Mr. Onyeanusi to file a reply to the defendant's response that shall include, at minimum, a statement expressing that he still wishes to proceed and is willing to comply with the requirements of the litigation process and the orders of the Court.*fn1

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that on or before May 25, 2012, Mr. Onyeanusi shall file a reply in support of his request. This reply shall include a statement that expresses his present willingness and ability to pursue his case and to comply with the requirements of the litigation process and the orders of the Court. The reply may also explain why Mr. Onyeanusi is entitled by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) to have his case reinstated despite the arguments made in the defendant's response; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that on or before June 8, 2012, the defendant may file a surreply that modifies or supplements its arguments with respect to the information about Mr. Onyeanusi's hospitalizations discussed above in footnote 1.

SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.