Pursuant to the Prison Litigation Reform Act ("PLRA"), unless a prisoner "is under imminent danger of serious physical injury," he may not proceed in forma pauperis if while incarcerated he has filed at least three prior cases that were dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for failure to state a claim. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); see Ibrahim v. District of Columbia, 463 F.3d 3, 6 (D.C. Cir. 2006). Plaintiff has accumulated the requisite three strikes. Moon v. Mo. Div. of Emp't Sec., No. 09-4140, 2009 WL 3261920, at *1 (W.D. Mo. Oct. 5, 2009) (denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissing claims without prejudice pursuant to § 1915(g)); see Moon v. Nat'l Asset Recovery Servs., No. 09-1129 (E.D. Mo. July 28, 2009) (dismissing as frivolous); Moon v. United States, No. 09-0006 (E.D. Mo. Feb. 3, 2009) (same); Moon v. Nat'l Asset Recovery Servs., No. 09-0117 (E.D. Mo. Feb. 2, 2009) (same). The plaintiff does not demonstrate that he is now facing an imminent danger of serious physical injury, and therefore he does not fall within the sole exception to the "three strikes" provision of the PLRA. Accordingly, the Court will revoke the plaintiff's in forma pauperis status, vacate the order granting his in forma pauperis application, bar the plaintiff from proceeding in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) in any future civil action filed in this district, and dismiss this action without prejudice to refiling upon payment in full of the $350.00 filing fee.