Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Cunningham v. O'Neill

United States District Court, District of Columbia

July 17, 2013

BENJAMIN CUNNINGHAM, Plaintiff,
v.
SEAN O'NEILL, et al., Defendants

BENJAMIN CUNNINGHAM, Plaintiff, Pro se, Bronx, NY.

For SEAN R. O'NEILL, Chief; FOIA's Appeal Agency, JANE AND JOHN DOES, CHRISTINE DAVENPORT, KERRY W. KIRCHER, JOSE E. SERRANO, Congressman, KRISTINA L. NORRIS, Special FBI Agent, NICHOLAS RICIGLIANO, DUSM, PETER M. SKINNER, AUSA, DAVID V. BOBER, AUSA, KEVIN N. FOX, Magistrate Judge (S.D.N.Y.), DEBORAH A. BATTS, Judge (S.D.N.Y.), Defendants: Nina Bafundo Crimm, LEAD ATTORNEY, U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Washington, DC.

OPINION

Page 268

ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Judge.

Pro se Plaintiff Benjamin Cunningham brought this suit under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. § 552, to compel the release of certain records relating to Mr. Cunningham's prior civil rights suit, Cunningham v. McCluskey, Civil Case No. 05-10169 (S.D.N.Y.), against individual Deputy U.S. Marshals and a New York City Police Department detective. Because FOIA authorizes relief only against covered federal agencies and the Defendants here are all individuals, this case will be dismissed.

I. FACTS

The origin of this case goes back some years. In 2005, United States Deputy Marshals searched Mr. Cunningham's New York City residence looking for his brother, fugitive Terrence Cunningham. Upon arriving at the house, the Deputy Marshals seized Benjamin Cunningham. While the search continued, Mr. Cunningham fled, handcuffed and in his underwear, and ran into or was sideswiped by a bus. He then managed to board the bus. The bus carried city transit officers; they held Mr. Cunningham until the U.S. Deputy Marshals retrieved him. After verifying that Mr. Cunningham was not Terrence, the officers released him. See Cunningham v. U.S. Congress House Ethics Comm., Civil Case No. 12-1935 (Compl. [Dkt. 1]).[1]

Based on this incident, Mr. Cunningham unsuccessfully sued the individual Deputy Marshals and a New York Police Department detective alleging Fourth and Fifth Amendment violations. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants. See Cunningham v. McCluskey, Civil Case No. 05-10169, (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 8, 2011) (Order adopting Report and Recommendation; qualified immunity barred the Fourth Amendment claim and the Fifth Amendment due process claim was not cognizable due to remedy available under the Federal Tort Claims Act). Mr. Cunningham appealed, but the Second Circuit dismissed the appeal as frivolous. See Cunningham v. McCulskey, No. 11-3597, (2d Cir. Feb. 14, 2012) (Mandate), cert. denied, 133 S.Ct. 124, 184 L.Ed.2d 27 (Oct. 1, 2012).[2]

Subsequently, Mr. Cunningham filed this FOIA suit against the following Defendants,

Page 269

all of whom are individual federal officials: Sean O'Neill, Chief of Administrative Appeals for the Office of Information Privacy, Department of Justice; Judge Deborah Batts, U.S. District Judge, Southern District of New York; Magistrate Judge Kevin Fox, Southern District of New York; David Bober, Assistant U.S. Attorney, District of New Jersey; Peter Skinner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Southern District of New York; Nicholas Ricigliano, Deputy U.S. Marshal; Kristin Norris, FBI Special Agent; Jose Serrano, U.S. Congressman; Kerry Kircher, General Counsel, U.S. House of Representatives; and Christine Davenport, Senior Assistant Counsel, U.S. House of Representatives. The Complaint alleges:

Defendants have willfully violated FOIA Laws against the (Pro-se) Plaintiff's secured Civil Rights in order to CONCEAL legal facts about how defendants [Judge Batts, Magistrate Judge Fox, AUSA Bober, AUSA Skinner, DUSM Ricigliano, and Special Agent Norris] . . . have willfully Faked Up/Invented Up a North Carolina State's Reliable Confidential Informant in order to DISMISSED the (pro-se) plaintiff's Civil Rights case against defendant DUSM Nicholas Ricigliano & " etc" (05 Civ. 10169).

Compl. [Dkt. 1] at 3 (errors in original). The Complaint further alleges that all Defendants have willfully concealed information and legal documents " regarding North Carolina State's Reliable Confidential Informant against the (pro-se) plaintiff's FOIA Request." Id. at 4. Mr. Cunningham seeks ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.