Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Intex Recreation Corporation v. Team Worldwide Corporation

United States District Court, District of Columbia

March 10, 2014

INTEX RECREATION CORPORATION, Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant,
v.
TEAM WORLDWIDE CORPORATION, Defendant/Counterclaim-Plaintiff.

ORDER

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN United States District Judge

For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Opinion, it is hereby

ORDERED that [212] plaintiff Intex Recreation Corporation’s (“Intex”) Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement is GRANTED; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that [211] defendant Team Worldwide Corporation’s Motion for Summary Judgment of Infringement is DENIED; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that judgment is entered for Intex on Claim I of Intex’s Amended Complaint; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that judgment is entered for Intex on Claim I of Team Worldwide Corporation’s Counterclaim; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Court DECLARES that Intex’s products containing or incorporating pumps with pump model numbers 619RW and 619RL and pumps of like structure DO NOT INFRINGE Claims 14 through 17 of U.S. Patent No. 6,793,469 B2; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Court DECLARES that Intex’s products containing or incorporating pumps with pump model numbers AP619, 639, and 626R and pumps of like structure DO NOT INFRINGE Claims 14 through 17 of U.S. Patent No. 6,793,469 B2; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that on or before March 28, 2014, Intex shall show cause as to why Claim II (patent invalidity) of Intex’s Amended Complaint should not be dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.

SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.