Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Lahroudi v. Mayorkas

United States District Court, District of Columbia

May 2, 2014

ALI FEIZOLLAHI LAHROUDI, Plaintiff,
v.
ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, et al., Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.

On March 18, 2014, Defendants filed a [7] Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Plaintiff's Complaint ("Motion to Dismiss"). Plaintiff is represented by Counsel. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(d), Plaintiff was required to respond to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss by no later than April 4, 2014. As of the date of this Order, the public docket reflects that Plaintiff has not filed a response to Defendants' [7] Motion to Dismiss nor has Plaintiff filed a motion for extension of time to respond to Defendants' Motion. Accordingly, the Court shall treat Defendants' Motion to Dismiss as conceded and dismiss the case. See LCvR 7(b) ("If such a memorandum is not filed within the prescribed time, the Court may treat the motion as conceded.").


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.