United States District Court, District of Columbia
Plaintiff, proceeding Pro se, has filed an action styled "Complaint for Notice of Intentional Error by Inferior Court and Change of Venue to D.C. Superior Court, " along with an application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court will grant the application and dismiss the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3) (requiring dismissal of an action "at any time" the Court determines that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction).
Plaintiff is a Colorado state prisoner who seeks review by this Court of rulings issued by the United States District Court for the District of Colorado and the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. See Compl. at 1. This Court is not a reviewing court and, thus, lacks subject matter jurisdiction to review the decisions of another district court or a higher federal court. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1332 (general jurisdictional provisions); Fleming v. United States, 847 F.Supp. 170, 172 (D.D.C. 1994), cert, denied 513 U.S. 1150 (1995) (citing District of Columbia Court of Appeals v.Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 482 (1983); Rooker v.Fidelity Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413, 415, 416 (1923)); see also Panko v.Rodak, 606 F.2d 168, 171 n.6 (7th Cir. 1979), cert, denied, 444 U.S. 1081 (1980) ("It seems axiomatic ...