United States District Court, District of Columbia
Gladys Kessler, United States District Court
The Government has filed a Classified Motion for a Supplemental Protective Order which would prohibit the distribution of, or discussion of, the Forcible Cell Extraction ("FCE") videotapes related to, this case with any other counsel than the current attorneys of record in
this case and the security-cleared attorneys in three related cases. Upon consideration of the Motion, Petitioner's Classified Opposition, and Respondent's Classified Reply, the Court concludes that the Motion may be granted.
The Government presents a number of arguments in support of its position. In particular, it emphasizes that counsel in this case will, of course, suffer no prejudice because they have the FCE videotapes. Counsel in three related cases will also suffer no prejudice because they have already been given access to the FCE videotapes. Therefore, what Petitioner's counsel is really doing in its Opposition is arguing on behalf of all the other security-cleared attorneys in the Guantanamo habeas cases (except
to the attorneys in the three related cases who have been given access to the videotapes). In essence, Petitioner's counsel is attempting to represent all those other attorneys who represent Guantanamo detainees. He simply does not have standing to do that, nor can he articulate whatever prejudice may be suffered by all of those other attorneys.
For these reasons, there is no one in a position, at this moment, to object to the Respondent's Motion, and it will be granted.
WHEREFORE; it is this 5th day August 2014 hereby
ORDERED, that the Classified Motion for Supplemental ...