Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Gordon v. United States

Court of Appeals of Columbia District

July 23, 2015

KELBY R. GORDON, APPELLANT,
v.
UNITED STATES, APPELLEE,

Argued December 16, 2014

Page 74

[Copyrighted Material Omitted]

Page 75

Appeal from the Superior Court of the District of Columbia. (CMD-3449-13). (Hon. Harold Cushenberry, Jr., Trial Judge).

Anna B. Scanlon for appellant.

Vanessa Goodwin, Assistant United States Attorney, with whom Ronald C. Machen Jr., United States Attorney at the time the brief was filed, and Elizabeth Trosman, John P. Mannarino, Kondi Kleinman, and Erik H. Zwicker, Assistant United States Attorneys, were on the brief, for appellee.

Before BECKWITH and MCLEESE, Associate Judges, and FERREN, Senior Judge.

OPINION

Page 76

Ferren, Senior Judge

Kelby R. Gordon appeals his conviction for possession of marijuana following a conditional guilty plea.[1] On appeal, Gordon argues that he was unlawfully " seized" when police officers, without reasonable articulable suspicion,[2] repeatedly questioned him about his identity for " about ten minutes." As a result, he argues, his statements to the police and the tangible evidence found on his person should have been suppressed. We agree with Gordon and reverse.

I.

On March 5, 2013, Metropolitan Police Department Officer Marboo Whisnant, accompanied by three fellow officers in the Robbery Unit, " saw a group of guys loitering in the hallway" of an apartment building in Southeast Washington, D.C. The officers pulled up to the building in an unmarked police vehicle, without flashing lights. Wearing plain clothes with black tactical vests that displayed " Police" on the front and back, the officers carried handcuffs, a baton, pepper spray, and a gun, and entered the building through an unlocked front door.

Officer Whisnant described the main landing where the police entered as " a little square area," and Gordon's defense investigator described it as a " little foyer" with " four or five steps to go down and about four or five steps to go up." When the four officers entered the foyer, they saw " about three to four guys inside." Two were standing on the main landing, the man later identified as Gordon was on the upward stairs, and the other individual was on the downward stairs. Officer Whisnant testified that the whole building smelled like burnt marijuana, but that the officers did not see any of the four individuals smoking it.

Once they smelled marijuana, the officers " made contact" with the four individuals in the foyer. Officer Whisnant testified that he had previously " stumbled upon individuals smoking in that hallway." In speaking with Gordon, Officer Whisnant did not inform him either that he was free to leave or that he could refuse to speak to the officers. Officer Whisnant asked Gordon for his identification to " figure out" who he was and where he lived. Gordon replied that he did not live in the building and did not have physical identification. Gordon told the officer, however, that his name was " Khalil Mikes." He also provided his date of birth and, in response to another inquiry, added that " he had been locked up in Washington, D.C. before."

Officer Whisnant thereupon entered Gordon's proffered information into the removable laptop from his squad car to " run him through the system," which takes " [a] matter of seconds" to return a result. But he " couldn't pull him up." The officer further testified that when the police " can't pull them up, more than likely, they're lying about their name." Officer Whisnant acknowledged that he then " just kept asking him about the spelling, is there anything--when he was locked up, did he give another name, does he have a[n] alias or anything he goes by. And eventually he gave [the officers] his real name." Where

Page 77

upon, the officer continued, " We ended up pulling up his picture in one [data] system. And then we ran him in WALES/NCIC and that revealed that he had a[n] outstanding warrant for a probation violation." [3] Gordon was then placed under arrest.

Gordon was asked whether he had anything illegal on his person, and Gordon replied that " he had some weed in his pants." [4] The officers ultimately found " eight small, clear zip-loc bags which all contained marijuana." Officer Whisnant acknowledged that Gordon did not consent to the search of his person, but he added that Gordon was " free to leave and walk away." The entire period from the time Officer Whisnant asked Gordon for identification to the officer's discovery of the outstanding warrant lasted " [a]bout 10 minutes," according to Whisnant. The trial court credited Officer Whisnant's testimony that, throughout the entire encounter, the officers spoke in a calm voice and did not draw their weapons.

Two days later, on March 7, Gordon was charged with unlawful possession of marijuana.[5] Counsel moved to suppress the marijuana and Gordon's statements to the police, arguing that the police had unlawfully seized his person without reasonable suspicion. On May 20, following a suppression hearing, the trial court denied the motion. The court found that the initial encounter with Officer Whisnant, when he asked Gordon for his name, was " consensual," and that " [i]t was perfectly reasonable for the police to talk to [Gordon] a little bit more to try to verify his identity" after Gordon apparently had provided a false name. Furthermore, added the court, while the officer was verifying Gordon's identity, Gordon " was not surrounded in a way that would have communicated to him, that is, to a reasonable person innocent of any crime, that he wasn't free to disengage from the contact." At the point the WALES search revealed that Gordon had an outstanding warrant, the court concluded, " the police had probable cause to arrest him and could search incident to that arrest." Ultimately, the trial court ruled that Gordon had not been " seized prior to [the officers'] learning about the warrant" ; thus, his " Fourth Amendment rights [were] not violated."

Gordon then entered a conditional guilty plea, reserving his right to appeal the denial of the motion to suppress. The court sentenced him to thirty days of imprisonment, with credit for time served, to run concurrently with any sentence that he was serving at the time of sentencing. The court also ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.